留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

深海海山底部反气旋急流的不对称性研究

黄阳阳 潘皓 谢晓辉

黄阳阳,潘皓,谢晓辉. 深海海山底部反气旋急流的不对称性研究[J]. 海洋学报,2025,47(6):1–12 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025053
引用本文: 黄阳阳,潘皓,谢晓辉. 深海海山底部反气旋急流的不对称性研究[J]. 海洋学报,2025,47(6):1–12 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025053
Huang Yangyang,Pan Hao,Xie Xiaohui. Asymmetric of anticyclonic jet at the bottom of deep-sea seamounts[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2025, 47(6):1–12 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025053
Citation: Huang Yangyang,Pan Hao,Xie Xiaohui. Asymmetric of anticyclonic jet at the bottom of deep-sea seamounts[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2025, 47(6):1–12 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025053

深海海山底部反气旋急流的不对称性研究

doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025053
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(42476019)、浙江省自然科学基金(LRG25D060002);海洋二所基本科研业务费重点类项目(SZ2403-2)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    黄阳阳(2000—),男,籍贯(省市),研究方向为物理海洋。E-mail:1205207650@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    谢晓辉,研究员,主要从事海洋动力过程研究。E-mail: xxie@sio.org.cn

Asymmetric of anticyclonic jet at the bottom of deep-sea seamounts

  • 摘要: 本文旨在利用热带西太平洋采薇海山的底部观测资料和数值模式,分析海山底部反气旋急流的不对称性特征。底部海流的观测结果显示,在海山底部存在东西方向上显著不对称的反气旋急流现象。双层模式再现了理想海山及采薇海山的底部流场结构及其不对称性特征。进一步分析表明,不对称性的主要来源是背景流的能量输入、β效应引发的涡度变化。文中依次分析了海山各个方位的流场特征,并详细解释了涡度变化如何影响底部急流及其不对称特征。此外,本文还讨论了其他环境参数(如底摩擦系数、约化重力)改变时对底部急流的影响。
  • 图  1  采薇海山底部的锚系观测

    图1a西北太平洋的海底地形。红框处为采薇海山。图1b中白色箭头是双层模式中流场模拟结果。采薇海山山顶水深约−1350 m。其中W、N、E、S是锚系观测点,黄色箭头表征此处锚系观测平均流速相对大小

    Fig.  1  Mooring observation at the bottom of Caiwei Seamount

    Fig.1a is the seafloor topography of the Northwest Pacific Ocean. The Caiwei Seamount is in red box. In Fig.1b, the white arrow is the flow field in two-layer model in this study. The water depth at the top of the mountain is the shallowest at −1350 m.W, N, E, and S are the mooring observation points. The yellow arrow characterizes the time-average flow velocity.

    图  2  双层等密度面模式初始设置

    Fig.  2  Initial setting of two-layer isopycnal-coordinate primitive equations model

    图  3  采薇海山底部锚系观测的时间系列

    Fig.  3  Time series of mooring observation at the bottom of Caiwei Seamount

    图  4  不同β值下的模式模拟流场

    白色箭头表示该点处的流场速度矢量,流速大小与颜色条一致。棕红色线是海山的等高线,范围从−5500 m至−1250 m,高度间隔250 m。后图一致

    Fig.  4  The model bottom flow field of the ideal seamount with different β

    The white arrow represents the flow field velocity vector, and brown lines are contour lines of the seamount, ranging from −5500 m to −1250 m, with a height interval of 250 m. The same applies to the subsequent figure

    图  5  不同β值下的模式模拟涡度分布

    Fig.  5  The vorticity distribution of the model bottom flow of ideal seamount with different β

    图  6  不同β值下理想海山的模式底部流场跨等深线分量

    Fig.  6  The cross-isobath component of the model bottom flow field of ideal seamount with different β

    图  7  地形放大后的模式模拟流场

    Fig.  7  The model bottom flow field of ideal seamount with the terrain amplification

    图  8  不同程度底摩擦的模式模拟流场

    Fig.  8  The model bottom flow field of ideal seamount with different bottom friction

    图  9  不同约化重力的模式模拟流场

    Fig.  9  The model bottom flow field of ideal seamount with different reduced gravity

    图  10  β效应引发的流线差异

    图a是在f平面下的流线,图b是在β平面下的流线

    Fig.  10  Streamline differences caused by the β-effect

    Fig.10a shows the streamline in the f - plane, and Fig.10b shows the streamline in the β-plane

    图  12  底摩擦效应引发的流线差异

    Fig.  12  Streamline differences caused by bottom friction

    图  11  流线的位涡守恒示意图

    实心红星表示极限涨点,空心红星表示极限落点;蓝色虚线表示离海山不同距离的流线

    Fig.  11  Potential vorticity conservation of streamlines

    Solid red star represents the limit up point, hollow red star represents the limit down point; the blue dotted lines represent the streamlines at different distances from the seamount

    表  1  锚系潜标的投放信息

    Tab.  1  Information of mooring instruments used in this study

    站点 坐标 观测水深 观测时间 仪器信息
    $ {\mathrm{W}} $ 15.589°N, 154.753°E 5050 m 2012年7月至
    2013年5月
    离底15 m ACM
    $ {\mathrm{N}} $ 16.078°N, 154.905°E 5383 m 2013年6月至
    2014年1月
    离底15 m ACM
    $ {\mathrm{E}} $ 15.955°N, 155.729°E 5666 m 2014年7月至
    2015年7月
    离底15 m ACM
    $ {\mathrm{S}} $ 15.250°N, 155.650°E 5770 m 2020年10月至
    2021年8月
    离底30 m ACM
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  双层等密度面模式的参数

    Tab.  2  Parameters of two-layer isopycnal-coordinate primitive equations model

    参数符号 参数值 含义
    $ {L}_{x} $ 1000 km 模式的横向尺度
    $ {L}_{y} $ 1000 km 模式的纵向尺度
    $ {H}_{s} $ 4110 m 海山高度
    $ {Z}_{s} $ 3500 m 半山腰处水深
    $ {Y}_{s} $ 40 km 半山腰处离中心轴的距离
    $ {W}_{s} $ 50 km 山坡的径向半宽度
    $ {\rho }_{0} $ 1000 $ \mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{m}}^{3} $ 标准密度
    $ g $ 9.8 $ \mathrm{m}/{\mathrm{s}}^{2} $ 重力加速度
    $ {g}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}} $ $ {10}^{-2}\ \mathrm{m}/{\mathrm{s}}^{2} $ 约化重力加速度
    $ {f}_{0} $ $ {10}^{-4}\ {\mathrm{s}}^{-1} $ 科氏参数常数
    $ \beta $ $ {10}^{-11}\ {\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1} $ 科氏参数的梯度
    $ {R}_{{\mathrm{b}}} $ $ {10}^{-3} $ 线性底摩擦参数
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Gevorgian J, Sandwell D T, Yu Yao, et al. Global distribution and morphology of small seamounts[J]. Earth and Space Science, 2023, 10(4): e2022EA002331. doi: 10.1029/2022EA002331
    [2] Mai Hongtao, Wang Dongxiao, Chen Hui, et al. Mid-deep circulation in the western South China sea and the impacts of the central depression belt and complex topography[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2024, 12(5): 700. doi: 10.3390/jmse12050700
    [3] Jiang Xingliang, Dong Changming, Ji Yuxiang, et al. Influences of deep-water seamounts on the hydrodynamic environment in the northwestern pacific ocean[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2021, 126(12): e2021JC017396. doi: 10.1029/2021JC017396
    [4] Perfect B, Kumar N, Riley J J. Vortex structures in the wake of an idealized seamount in rotating, stratified flow[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(17): 9098−9105. doi: 10.1029/2018GL078703
    [5] Shu Yeqiang, Wang Jinghong, Xue Huijie, et al. Deep-current intraseasonal variability interpreted as topographic rossby waves and deep eddies in the Xisha Islands of the South China Sea[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2022, 52(7): 1415−1430. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-21-0147.1
    [6] Carter G S, Gregg M C, Merrifield, M A. Flow and mixing around a small seamount on Kaena Ridge, Hawaii[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2006, 36(6): 1036−1052. doi: 10.1175/JPO2924.1
    [7] Nikurashin M, Ferrari R. Global energy conversion rate from geostrophic flows into internal lee waves in the deep ocean[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(8): L08610.
    [8] Taylor G I. Experiments on the motion of solid bodies in rotating fluids[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series A: Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 1923, 104(725): 213−218.
    [9] Lavelle J W, Mohn C. Motion, commotion, and biophysical connections at deep ocean seamounts[J]. Oceanography, 2010, 23(1): 90−103. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2010.64
    [10] White M, Mohn C. Seamounts: A review of physical processes and their influence on the seamount ecosystem (OASIS Report)[R]. Ireland: NUI, Gaiway, 2004.
    [11] Chapman D C, Haidvogel D B. Formation of Taylor caps over a tall isolated seamount in a stratified ocean[J]. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 1992, 64(1/4): 31−65.
    [12] Haidvogel D B, Beckmann A. Chapman D C, et al. Numerical simulation of flow around a tall isolated seamount. Part II: Resonant generation of trapped waves[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1993, 23(11): 2373−2391. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<2373:NSOFAA>2.0.CO;2
    [13] Xu G, Lavelle J W. Circulation, hydrography, and transport over the summit of axial seamount, a deep volcano in the Northeast Pacific[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2017, 122(7): 5404−5422. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012464
    [14] Guo Binbin, Wang Weiqiang, Shu Yeqiang, et al. Observed deep anticyclonic cap over Caiwei Guyot[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2020, 125(10): e2020JC016254. doi: 10.1029/2020JC016254
    [15] Beckmann A, Mohn C. The upper ocean circulation at great meteor seamount Part II: retention potential of the seamount induced circulation[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2002, 52(4): 194−204. doi: 10.1007/s10236-002-0018-3
    [16] White M, Bashmachnikov I, Arístegui J, et al. Physical processes and seamount productivity[M]//Pitcher T J, Morato T, Hart P J B, et al. Seamounts: Ecology, fisheries and conservation, Oxford, UK: Wiley Online Library, 2007: 65−84.
    [17] Ye Ruijie, Shang Xiaodong, Zhao Wei, et al. Circulation driven by multihump turbulent mixing over a seamount in the South China Sea[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2022, 8: 794156. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.794156
    [18] Owens W B, Hogg N G. Oceanic observations of stratified Taylor columns near a bump[J]. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 1980, 27(12): 1029−1045. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(80)90063-1
    [19] Brink K H. Tidal and lower frequency currents above Fieberling Guyot[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1995, 100(6): 10817−10832.
    [20] Lavelle J W. Flow, hydrography, turbulent mixing, and dissipation at Fieberling Guyot examined with a primitive equation model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2006, 111(C7): C07014.
    [21] Chapman D C, Haidvogel D B. Generation of internal lee waves trapped over a tall isolated seamount[J]. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 1993, 69(1/4): 33−54.
    [22] Xie Xiaohui, Wang Yan, Liu Xiaohui, et al. Enhanced near-bottom circulation and mixing driven by the surface eddies over abyssal seamounts[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2022, 208: 102896. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102896
    [23] Ma Weidong, Wang Jianing, Wang Fan, et al. The vertical structure and intraseasonal variability of the deep currents in the Southern Philippine Basin[J], Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2023, 197: 104043.
    [24] Saenko O A, Merryfield W J. On the effect of topographically enhanced mixing on the global ocean circulation[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2005, 35(5): 826−834. doi: 10.1175/JPO2722.1
    [25] Stewart A L, Dellar P J. An energy and potential enstrophy conserving numerical scheme for the multi-layer shallow water equations with complete Coriolis force[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 313: 99−120. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.042
    [26] Stewart R H. Introduction to Physical Oceanography[M]. Austin: The University of Texas, 2006. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献出版信息, 请确认)
    [27] Sutyrin, G, Herbette S, Carton X. Deformation and splitting of baroclinic eddies encountering a tall seamount[J]. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2011, 105(4/5): 478−505.
    [28] Herbette S, Morel Y, Arhan M. Erosion of a surface vortex by a seamount on the β plane[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2005, 35(11): 2012−2030. doi: 10.1175/JPO2809.1
    [29] Fox-Kemper B. Eddies and friction : removal of vorticity from the wind-driven gyre[D]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  20
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-10-23
  • 修回日期:  2025-04-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-05-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回