Characteristics of zooplankton community and its influencing factors in the Tieshan Bay, Beibu Gulf of the South China Sea
-
摘要: 为探究北部湾铁山港海域浮游动物群落结构特征及变化规律，根据2018年4月（春季）、7月（夏季）、10月（秋季）和2022年7月（夏季）的航次数据，分析了浮游动物的丰度、生物量、种类组成、优势种及其与环境因子的关系。研究海域共鉴定出浮游动物162种（类）。2018年浮游动物丰度和生物量表现为夏季（274.58 ± 221.15 ind./m3，152.09 ± 142.97 mg/m3）高于秋季（215.72 ± 114.81 ind./m3，87.65 ± 46.70 mg/m3）高于春季（193.75 ± 185.81 ind./m3，60.95 ± 47.96 mg/m3）的季节特征。优势种共15种，优势种组成有明显的季节变化。春季优势种有大西洋五角水母（Muggiaea atlantica）和软拟海樽（Dolioletta gegenbauri）等外海种；球型侧腕水母（Pleurobrachia globosa）仅在夏季为优势种，秋季占据主导地位的是太平洋纺锤水蚤（Acartia pacifica）和锥形宽水蚤（Temora turbinata）等近岸暖水种。对比2018年夏季，2022年夏季温度和叶绿素a浓度升高，使得水母类在浮游动物群落结构中的占比增加。铁山港海域浮游动物群落结构季节间差异和年际差异主要受温度、盐度、和叶绿素a浓度的影响。研究还表明，铁山港海域浮游动物群落结构趋于小型化，群落稳定性较差。Abstract: To explore the characteristics and changes of zooplankton community structure in Tieshan Bay area of the Beibu Gulf, the abundance, biomass, species composition, dominant species and their relationship with environmental factors were analyzed based on the investigation conducted during April 2018 (spring), July 2018 (summer), October 2018 (autumn) and July 2022 (summer). A total of 162 species (classes) of zooplankton were identified. In 2018, the abundance and biomass of zooplankton were higher in summer (274.58 ± 221.15 ind./m3, 152.09 ± 142.97 mg/m3), higher than in autumn (215.72 ± 114.81 ind./m3, 87.65 ± 46.70 mg/m3), and higher than in spring (193.75 ± 185.81 ind./m3, 60.95 ± 47.96 mg/m3). There were 15 dominant species. The dominant species had obvious seasonal variation. In spring, the dominant species were offshore species such as Muggiaea atlantica and Dolioletta gegenbauri. Pleurobrachia globosa was dominant species only in summer. Nearshore warm-water species such as Acartia pacifica and Temora turbinata dominated in autumn. Compared with the summer of 2018, the temperature and chlorophyll a concentration in the summer of 2022 increased, which increased the proportion of jellyfish in the zooplankton community structure. The seasonal and interannual differences of zooplankton community structure in Tieshan Bay were mainly affected by temperature, salinity and Chla concentration. The study also shows that the community structure of zooplankton tends to be miniaturized and the community stability is poor.
-
Key words:
- zooplankton /
- community structure /
- environmental factors /
- seasonal variation /
- Tieshan Bay
-
图 2 铁山港温度（℃）、盐度（‰）和叶绿素a浓度（mg/m3）的时空分布特征
Fig. 2 Temporal and spatial variation of temperature (℃) 、salinity (‰) and Chlorophyll a concentration (mg/m3) in Tieshan Bay
图 3 铁山港营养盐时空分布特征(单位: μmol/L）
Fig. 3 Temporal and spatial variation of nutrients in waters adjacent to the to the Tieshan Bay (μmol/L)
图 4 铁山港浮游动物种类数的时空分布
Fig. 4 Spatial and temporal distribution of zooplankton species in Tieshan Bay
图 6 铁山港浮游动物丰度（ind./m3）和湿重生物量（mg/m3）的时空分布
Fig. 6 Temporal and spatial variation of natural weight (mg/m3) and abundance (ind./m3) of zooplankton in waters adjacent to the Tieshan Bay
图 7 铁山港浮游动物多样性指数和均匀度指数的时空分布
Fig. 7 Temporal and spatial variation of Shannon-Wiener index and Pielou evenness index of zooplankton in Tieshan Bay
图 8 优势种与环境参数的RDA分析
注：Chla: 叶绿素a浓度；Do：溶解氧含量；Tem: 温度；Tr: 透明度；Sal：盐度；DIN: 溶解无机氮；DIP: 溶解无机磷； Si: 活性硅酸盐
Fig. 8 Redundancy analysis (RDA) results of dominant species and environmental parameters
Notes: Chla: Chlorophyll a concentration; DO: Dissolved oxygen; Tem:Temperature; Tr: Transparency; Sal: Salinity; DIN: Dissolved inorganic nitrogen; DIP: Dissolved inorganic phosphorus; Si: Soluble reactive silicate
图 10 2018年和2022年夏季浮游动物主要类群与环境因素的RDA分析
注：绿色方形代表2018年夏季站位，黄色圆形代表2022年夏季站位
Fig. 10 Redundancy analysis (RDA) results of major zooplankton groups and environmental factors in summer of 2018 and 2022
Notes: The green square represents the stations in summer 2018 and the yellow circle represents the stations in summer 2022.
表 1 铁山港浮游动物的种类组成和相对丰度（%）
Tab. 1 Species composition and relative abundance (%) of zooplankton in Tieshan Bay
类群
Taxa春季 夏季 秋季 2022夏季 种类 相对丰度（%） 种类 相对丰度（%） 种类 相对丰度（%） 种类 相对丰度（%） 水螅水母类 Hydromedusae 15 8.61 8 1.05 15 2.01 16 1.29 管水母类 Siphonophorae 2 6.95 / / / / / / 钵水母类 Scyphozoa / / 1 0.09 / / 1 0.04 栉水母类 Ctenophores 1 0.04 1 4.19 1 0.43 1 7.15 浮游多毛类 Polychaeta 1 0.29 1 0.04 / / / / 腹足类 Gastropoda 2 0.16 / / 3 0.51 / / 枝角类 Cladocera 1 0.18 1 2.39 2 3.49 2 0.97 介形类 Ostracoda 1 0.88 1 0.13 1 3.26 / / 桡足类 Copepoda 23 6.13 24 25.72 36 38.89 19 21.64 端足类 Amphipoda / / / / 1 0.01 2 0.10 樱虾类 Decapoda 1 0.27 / 5.27 3 8.30 2 14.11 等足类 Isopoda 1 0.14 / / / / / / 歪尾类 Anomura / / / / / / 1 0.07 糠虾类 Mysids 1 0.04 / / 1 0.07 / / 毛颚类 Chaetognatha 7 2.39 7 7.71 11 13.64 10 10.90 被囊类 Tunicata 3 4.48 1 0.49 1 0.36 2 0.09 浮游幼虫类 Planktonic larvae 14 69.43 15 52.91 14 29.03 17 43.65 总计 Total 73 100.00 60 100.00 89 100.00 73 100.00 注：“/”表示该类群未出现 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 铁山港浮游动物优势种的丰度（ind./m3）和优势度（Y）
Tab. 2 Abundance (ind./m3) and dominance (Y) of dominant species of zooplankton in Tieshan Bay
优势种 2018年春季 2018年夏季 2018年秋季 2022年夏季 平均丰度
/(ind./m3)优势度 平均丰度
/(ind./m3)优势度 平均丰度
/(ind./m3)优势度 平均丰度
/(ind./m3)优势度 大腺拟杯水母 Phialella macrogona 3.89 ± 7.43 0.02 — — — — — — 双生水母 Diphyes chamissonis 6.88 ± 14.91 0.04 — — — — — — 大西洋五角水母 Muggiaea atlantica 6.59 ± 15.49 0.05 — — — — — — 软拟海樽 Dolioletta gegenbauri 7.70 ± 15.46 0.04 — — — — — — 球型侧腕水母 Pleurobrachia globosa — — 11.51 ± 18.08 0.08 — — 28.51 ± 60.25 0.06 肥胖三角溞 Pseudevadne tergestina — — 6.57 ± 11.71 0.03 — — — — 太平洋纺锤水蚤 Acartia pacifica — — 29.43 ± 59.36 0.15 22.27 ± 40.30 0.11 41.12 ± 60.21 0.12 强额孔雀哲水蚤 Pavocalanus crassirostris — — 5.41 ± 9.82 0.03 — — 亚强次真哲水蚤 Subeucalanus subcrassus — — 13.25 ± 24.48 0.06 7.81 ± 9.91 0.04 — — 锥形宽水蚤 Temora turbinata — — 7.59 ± 10.10 0.03 19.26 ± 34.41 0.09 — — 亨生莹虾 Lucifer hanseni — — 13.05 ± 28.78 0.04 14.20 ± 21.39 0.05 43.66 ± 44.07 0.13 肥胖箭虫 Flaccisagitta enflata — — 13.88 ± 24.59 0.07 20.68 ± 33.29 0.14 30.35 ± 44.28 0.08 瘦形歪水蚤 Tortanus gracilis — — — — 6.45 ± 9.49 0.03 — — 红纺锤水蚤 Acartia erythraeus — — — — — — 12.06 ± 17.04 0.03 针刺真浮萤 Euconchoecia aculeata — — — — 7.03 ± 12.03 0.02 — — 注： “—”：物种在对应季节不是优势种
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 浮游动物群落结构差异的累积贡献度分析
Tab. 3 Analysis of the cumulative contribution of differences in zooplankton community structure
种类 平均不相似性 累计贡献度（%） 2018年春季和
2018年秋季肥胖软箭虫 0.73 19.0 太平洋纺锤水蚤 0.71 25.3 锥形宽水蚤 0.68 42.3 亨生莹虾 0.65 55.9 亚强次真哲水蚤 0.76 58.4 2018年春季和
2022年夏季亨生莹虾 0.93 34.3 太平洋纺锤水蚤 0.66 41.6 球形侧腕水母 0.34 48.7 肥胖软箭虫 0.82 54.5 中型莹虾 0.35 67.0
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 铁山港海域浮游动物群落与其它海湾的比较
Tab. 4 Comparisons of zooplankton between the Tieshan Bay and other coastal embayments
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Vargas C A, Martínez R A, Cuevas L A, et al. The relative importance of microbial and classical food webs in a highly productive coastal upwelling area[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2007, 52(4): 1495−1510. doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1495 [2] Steinberg D K, Landry M R. Zooplankton and the ocean carbon cycle[J]. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2017, 9: 413−444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015924 [3] De Puelles M L F, Molinero J C. Decadal changes in hydrographic and ecological time-series in the Balearic Sea(western Mediterranean), identifying links between climate and zooplankton[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2008, 65(3): 311−317. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn017 [4] 尹健强, 黄良民, 李开枝, 等. 南海西北部陆架区沿岸流和上升流对中华哲水蚤分布的影响[J]. 海洋学报, 2013, 35(2): 143−153.Yin Jianqiang, Huang Liangmin, Li Kaizhi, et al. Effects of coastal current and upwelling on the distributions of Calanus sinicus on the northwest continental shelf of the South China Sea[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2013, 35(2): 143−153. [5] Chen Xueyang, Cui Zhengguo, Zhang Yan, et al. Contrasting effects of river inflow and seawater intrusion on zooplankton community structure in Jiaozhou Bay, the Yellow Sea[J]. Marine Environmental Research, 2023, 192: 106194. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106194 [6] Han Qingxi, Wang Xiaobo, Peng Songyao. Distribution pattern of zooplankton assemblages in the eutrophic Hangzhou Bay, China[J]. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2024, 70: 103368. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103368 [7] Mao Ming, Zhu Yuanli, Zhu Xuyu, et al. Response of zooplankton to warming in a low-salinity, eutrophic bay[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 153: 110459. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110459 [8] 黄丽婷, 赖俊翔, 张荣灿, 等. 北海铁山港海域大型底栖动物群落结构研究[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 586−598.Huang Liting, Lai Junxiang, Zhang Rongcan, et al. Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 586−598. [9] 孙燕, 申友利, 石洪源, 等. 基于主成分分析的铁山港水质时空变化及驱动因素[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2022, 41(1): 30−36.Sun Yan, Shen Youli, Shi Hongyuan, et al. Spatio-temporal variation characteristics and driving factors of water quality in Tieshangang Bay based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2022, 41(1): 30−36. [10] Zhang Peng, Wu Siying, Xu Menghan, et al. Spatiotemporal nutrient patterns, stoichiometry, and eutrophication assessment in the Tieshan Bay coastal water, China[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(8): 1602. doi: 10.3390/jmse11081602 [11] 李萍, 莫海连, 郭钊. 2016年北部湾近岸海域海水环境质量评价[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2019(1): 54−64.Li Ping, Mo Hailian, Guo Zhao. Annual assessment of seawater quality of Beibu Gulf in 2016[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2019(1): 54−64. [12] 钟炜萍, 黄雄良. 铁山港湾近8年溶解氧状况与变化趋势[J]. 广西科学院学报, 2021, 37(1): 22−28.Zhong Weiping, Huang Xiongliang. Status and trend of dissolved oxygen in Tieshangang Bay in recent 8 years[J]. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 2021, 37(1): 22−28. [13] Lu Jingfang, Zhang Yibo, Shi Honghua, et al. Spatio-temporal changes and driving forces of reclamation based on remote sensing: a case study of the Guangxi Beibu Gulf[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2023, 10: 1112487. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1112487 [14] 郑挺, 林元烧, 曹文清, 等. 北部湾北部生态系统结构与功能——浮游动物空间生态位及其分化[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3635−3649.Zheng Ting, Lin Yuanshao, Cao Wenqing, et al. Ecosystem structure and function in northern Beibu Gulf: zooplankton spatial niche and its differentiation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3635−3649. [15] 郑白雯, 曹文清, 林元烧, 等. 北部湾北部生态系统结构与功能研究: Ⅱ. 浮游动物数量分布及优势种[J]. 海洋学报, 2014, 36(4): 82−90.Zheng Baiwen, Cao Wenqing, Lin Yuanshao, et al. Ecosystem structure and function in northern Beibu Gulf: Ⅱ. Quantitative distribution and dominant species of zooplankton[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2014, 36(4): 82−90. [16] 郑白雯, 曹文清, 林元烧, 等. 北部湾北部生态系统结构与功能研究: Ⅰ. 浮游动物种类组成及其时空变化[J]. 海洋学报, 2013, 35(6): 154−161.Zheng Baiwen, Cao Wenqing, Lin Yuanshao, et al. Ecosystem structure and function in northern Beibu Gulf: I. The temporal and spatial variation of species composition on zooplankton[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2013, 35(6): 154−161. [17] 庞碧剑, 蓝文陆, 黎明民, 等. 北部湾近岸海域浮游动物群落结构特征及季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(19): 7014−7024.Pang Bijian, Lan Wenlu, Li Mingmin, et al. Community structure and seasonal variation of zooplankton in coastal Beibu Gulf[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(19): 7014−7024. [18] Lao Qibin, Zhang Shuwen, Li Zhiyang, et al. Quantification of the seasonal intrusion of water masses and their impact on nutrients in the Beibu Gulf using dual water isotopes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2022, 127(7): e2021JC018065. doi: 10.1029/2021JC018065 [19] 劳齐斌, 刘国强, 申友利, 等. 北部湾入海河流营养盐的分布特征及入海通量研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2020, 42(12): 93−100.Lao Qibin, Liu Guoqiang, Shen Youli, et al. Distribution characteristics and fluxes of nutrients in the rivers of the Beibu Gulf[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2020, 42(12): 93−100. [20] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. GB 17378.7-2007, 海洋监测规范第7部分: 近海污染生态调查和生物监测[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, National Standardization Administration. GB 17378.7-2007, The specification for marine monitoring—Part 7: ecological survey for offshore pollution and biological monitoring[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008. [21] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. HJ 442-2008, 近岸海域环境监测规范[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. HJ 442-2008, Specification for offshore environmental monitoring[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2009. [22] 中国环境监测总站. 国家近岸海域海水水质监测操作技术规程(试行)[EB/OL]. https://www.cnemc.cn/zzjj/jgsz/hys/gzdt_hys/201703/P020181010723427189521.pdf, 2017.China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. National technical regulations for the operation of monitoring seawater quality in offshore waters (trial)[EB/OL]. https://www.cnemc.cn/zzjj/jgsz/hys/gzdt_hys/201703/P020181010723427189521.pdf, 2017. (查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献英文信息,请确认) [23] 郑重, 李少菁, 许振祖. 海洋浮游生物学[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1984: 1−653.Zheng Zhong, Li Shaojing, Xu Zhenzu. Marine Planktology[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 1984: 1−653. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献英文信息, 请确认) [24] 徐兆礼, 陈亚瞿. 东黄海秋季浮游动物优势种聚集强度与鲐鲹渔场的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 1989, 8(4): 13−15,19.Xu Zhaoli, Chen Yaqu. Aggregated intensity of dominant species of zooplankton in autumn in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1989, 8(4): 13−15,19. [25] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379−423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [26] Xiang Chenhui, Ke Zhixin, Li Kaizhi, et al. Effects of terrestrial inputs and seawater intrusion on zooplankton community structure in Daya Bay, South China Sea[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2021, 167: 112331. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112331 [27] 陆虹. 广西气候公报[R]. 南宁: 广西壮族自治区气象局, 2020.Lu Hong. Guangxi Climate Bulletin[R]. Nanning: Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Meteorological Bureau, 2020. [28] Li Chaolun, Sun Song, Wang Rong, et al. Feeding and respiration rates of a planktonic copepod(Calanus sinicus) oversummering in Yellow Sea Cold Bottom Waters[J]. Marine Biology, 2004, 145(1): 149−157. [29] 袁涌铨. 人类活动与自然驱动不同背景下的典型海域营养盐分布与关键过程研究[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所), 2016.Yuan Yongquan. Distribution and key processes of nutrients in the typical waters with anthropogenic activities and natural influences[D]. Qingdao: Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016. [30] 姚少慧, 于红兵, 王霞, 等. 湛江港夏秋季浮游动物群落结构的分布与变化[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(13): 192−196.YAO Shaohui, YU Hongbing, WANG Xia, et al. Study on the variation and distribution of zooplankton community in the Zhanjiang Bay in summer and autumn[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(13): 192−196. [31] 徐兆礼. 东海水螅水母环境适应与生态类群[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(1): 177−184.Xu Zhaoli. Water environment adaptability and ecological groups of Hydroidomedusae in East China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(1): 177−184. [32] Licandro P, Souissi S, Ibanez F, et al. Long-term variability and environmental preferences of calycophoran siphonophores in the Bay of Villefranche(north-western Mediterranean)[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2012, 97−100: 152−163. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2011.11.004 [33] Lo W T, Yu S F, Hsieh H Y. Effects of summer mesoscale hydrographic features on epipelagic siphonophore assemblages in the surrounding waters of Taiwan, western North Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Oceanography, 2013, 69(5): 495−509. doi: 10.1007/s10872-013-0188-2 [34] 高倩, 陈佳杰, 徐兆礼, 等. 长江口及邻近海域浮游水螅水母、管水母和栉水母的丰度分布与季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(22): 7328−7337.Gao Qian, Chen Jiajie, Xu Zhaoli, et al. Abundance distribution and seasonal variation of medusae, siphonophores, and ctenophores in the Changjiang(Yangtze River) Estuary and the adjacent East China Sea[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(22): 7328−7337. [35] Huskin I, Elices M J, Anadón R. Salp distribution and grazing in a saline intrusion off NW Spain[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2003, 42(1/2): 1−11. [36] Martin B, Koppelmann R, Kassatov P. Ecological relevance of salps and doliolids in the northern Benguela Upwelling System[J]. Journal of Plankton Research, 2017, 39(2): 290−304. [37] 莫永杰. 北部湾北部浅海沉积物的粒度类型[J]. 热带海洋, 1990, 9(1): 87−93.Mo Yongjie. Grain size types of sediments of the shallow waters in northern Beibu Gulf[J]. Tropic Oceanology, 1990, 9(1): 87−93. [38] 侍茂崇. 北部湾环流研究述评[J]. 广西科学, 2014, 21(4): 313−324.Shi Maochong. Study comments on circulation in Beibu Gulf[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 2014, 21(4): 313−324. [39] Gao Jingsong, Xue Huijie, Chai Fei, et al. Modeling the circulation in the Gulf of Tonkin, South China Sea[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2013, 63(8): 979−993. doi: 10.1007/s10236-013-0636-y [40] 庞碧剑, 李天深, 蓝文陆, 等. 钦州湾秋季和春季浮游动物分布特征及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(17): 6204−6216.Pang Bijian, Li Tianshen, Lan Wenlu, et al. Distribution patterns and environmental factors of zooplankton in the Qinzhou Bay in spring and autumn[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(17): 6204−6216. [41] 丘书院. 中国南海栉水母类初志[J]. 动物学报, 1957, 9(1): 85−100,118−123.Qiu Shuyuan. Preliminary notes on the ctenophores of the South China Sea[J]. Current Zoology, 1957, 9(1): 85−100,118−123. [42] 张金标. 我国东南近岸海域球型侧腕水母的分布和丰度[J]. 海洋学报, 1983, 5(S1): 840−846.Zhang Jinbiao. Distribution and abundance of Pleurobrachia globosa in coastal waters of southeast China[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 1983, 5(S1): 840−846. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献英文信息, 请确认) [43] 陈丽华, 陈钢, 李少菁, 等. 厦门港球型侧腕水母(Pleurobrachia globosa)的摄食研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 42(2): 228−232.Chen Lihua, Chen Gang, Li Shaojing, et al. Studies on feeding of ctenophore Pleurobrachia globosa in Xiamen Harbour[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 2003, 42(2): 228−232. [44] Wang Shiwei, Zhang Guangtao, Zhou Konglin, et al. Long-term population variability and reproductive strategy of a northward expanded ctenophore Pleurobrachia globosa Moser, 1903 in a temperate bay, China[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2020, 533: 151457. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2020.151457 [45] Liu Qinyu, Zhang Qi. Analysis on long-term change of sea surface temperature in the China Seas[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2013, 12(2): 295−300. doi: 10.1007/s11802-013-2172-2 [46] Purcell J E, Uye S I, Lo W T. Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and their direct consequences for humans: a review[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2007, 350: 153−174. doi: 10.3354/meps07093 [47] Dippner J W. Competition between different groups of phytoplankton for nutrients in the southern North Sea[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 1998, 14(1/2): 181−198. [48] 龚玉艳, 张才学, 陈作志, 等. 湛江湾浮游动物群落结构特征及其周年变化[J]. 海洋科学, 2015, 39(12): 46−55.Gong Yuyan, Zhang Caixue, Chen Zuozhi, et al. Structural characteristics of zooplankton populations and their annual changes in Zhanjiang Bay[J]. Marine Sciences, 2015, 39(12): 46−55. [49] 王雪辉, 邱永松, 杜飞雁, 等. 北部湾秋季底层鱼类多样性和优势种数量的变动趋势[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(2): 333−342. doi: 10.5846/stxb201011291700Wang Xuehui, Qiu Yongsong, Du Feiyan, et al. Dynamics of demersal fish species diversity and biomass of dominant species in autumn in the Beibu Gulf, northwestern South China Sea[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(2): 333−342. doi: 10.5846/stxb201011291700 [50] 徐兆礼. 东海浮游十足类优势种环境适应的研究[J]. 水产学报, 2005, 29(6): 762−768.Xu Zhaoli. Study on the dominant species of pelagic Decapods in the East China Sea and their ecological adaptability[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2005, 29(6): 762−768. [51] 潘非斐, 曹文清, 林元烧, 等. 北部湾东侧海域桡足类种类组成及其时空分布[M]//林元烧, 蔡立哲. 北部湾海洋科学研究论文集(第3辑): 海洋生物与生态专辑. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2011: 36−54.Pan Feifei, Cao Wenqing, Lin Yuanshao, et al. Species composition and spatiotemporal distribution of copepods in the eastern part of the Beibu Gulf[M]//Lin Yuanshao, Cai Lizhe. Proceedings of Marine Scientific Research in the Beibu Gulf (Volume 3): An album of Marine life and ecology. Beijing: Ocean Press, 2011: 36−54. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献英文信息, 请确认) [52] 高倩, 徐兆礼. 瓯江口夏、秋季浮游动物种类组成及其多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(10): 2048−20255.Gao Qian, Xu Zhaoli. Species composition and diversity of zooplankton in Oujiang River estuary in summer and autumn[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(10): 2048−2055. [53] 蓝文陆, 李天深, 刘勐伶, 等. 钦州湾丰水期和枯水期浮游动物群落特征[J]. 海洋学报, 2015, 37(4): 124−133.Lan Wenlu, Li Tianshen, Liu Mengling, et al. Characteristics of zooplankton community in the Qinzhou Bay during flood and dry seasons[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2015, 37(4): 124−133. -
图(10) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 23
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
