Mobility and transformation of mercury in the sediments of Changjiang estuarine wetlands following the soluble ionic mercury inputs：A long-term microcosm study

Lv Shaoyang; Bi Qiaoning; Chen Yuanyuan; Zhou Limin; Zheng Xiangmin; Wang Yongjie

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Haiyang Xuebao > 2025 > Accepted Manuscript

Lv Shaoyang，Bi Qiaoning，Chen Yuanyuan, et al. Mobility and transformation of mercury in the sediments of Changjiang estuarine wetlands following the soluble ionic mercury inputs：A long-term microcosm study[J]. Haiyang Xuebao，2025, 47(x)：1–12

Citation:

PDF( 1536 KB)

Mobility and transformation of mercury in the sediments of Changjiang estuarine wetlands following the soluble ionic mercury inputs：A long-term microcosm study

1.
School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Received Date: 2024-12-26
Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-29

Available Online: 2025-04-24

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate the mobility and transformation of mercury (Hg) in the wetlands of Changjiang Estuary, microcosm incubation experiments were conducted under different redox conditions over a long period (252 days). Four sediments collected from different wetlands were added with dissolved Hg(NO₃)₂ to simulate recent Hg inputs to wetlands, resulting in sediment total Hg increased by 109.7−275.1%. (1) The results showed that the concentrations of methylmercury (MeHg) in sediments increased by 1.9−361.5% (on average 183.0%) over the course of incubation. Amendment of litterfall after 140 days incubation, anaerobic degradation of litter can significantly enhance MeHg production with a larger increase (on average 260.2%) compared to those in the control. These results suggest that soluble Hg is easily methylated to MeHg, especially with labile organic matter inputs, and the aging processes of Hg could be significantly influenced by labile organic matter. Furthermore, MeHg/THg (%), as an estimate of long-term MeHg production were significantly different among sediments for all sampling time points, which was most probably due to the differences of the Hg methylating bacteria in sediments. (2) During oxidation stage of the sediments, a significant negative correlation between the MeHg concentrations and the redox potential (Eh) was observed. The results indicate that MeHg demethylation occurred under oxic resuspension conditions, which was enhanced in the presence of labile organic matter. This was most probably due to the combination of biotic demethylation with aerobic microorganisms and abiotic demethylation associated with reactive oxygen species from oxygenation of Fe(II)-bearing particles. The role of the abiotic pathways and mechanisms in the degradation of methylmercury in estuaries, coasts and other natural aquatic systems needs to be further investigated. (3) Most of the Hg accumulated in the ＜8 μm fractions, probably due to the formation of Hg-organic matter complexes that was aggregated with metal (oxyhydr)oxides and clay minerals. Thus, very fine particles may be the main carriers of Hg in Changjiang Estuary.
- Changjiang estuary,
- wetland,
- methylmercury,
- organic matter,
- sediment resuspension

FullText(HTML)

References(48)

References

[1]	United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Global mercury assessment 2018[EB/OL]. https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/global-mercury-assessment-2018, 2019-08-21.
[2]	Obrist D, Kirk J L, Zhang Lei, et al. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: changes of emissions, climate, and land use[J]. Ambio, 2018, 47(2): 116−140. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9
[3]	Barbier E B, Hacker S D, Kennedy C, et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2011, 81(2): 169−193. doi: 10.1890/10-1510.1
[4]	Krabbenhoft D P, Sunderland E M. Global change and mercury[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6153): 1457−1458. doi: 10.1126/science.1242838
[5]	Hsu-Kim H, Eckley C S, Achá D, et al. Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes[J]. Ambio, 2018, 47(2): 141−169. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1006-7
[6]	Liu Maodian, Zhang Qianru, Yu Chenghao, et al. Observation-based mercury export from rivers to coastal oceans in East Asia[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(20): 14269−14280.
[7]	Amos H M, Jacob D J, Kocman D, et al. Global biogeochemical implications of mercury discharges from rivers and sediment burial[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(16): 9514−9522.
[8]	Hsu-Kim H, Kucharzyk K H, Zhang Tong, et al. Mechanisms regulating mercury bioavailability for methylating microorganisms in the aquatic environment: a critical review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(6): 2441−2456.
[9]	Li Yanbin, Cai Yong. Progress in the study of mercury methylation and demethylation in aquatic environments[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(2): 177−185. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5416-4
[10]	Liu Maodian, Mason R P, Vlahos P, et al. Riverine discharge fuels the production of methylmercury in a large temperate estuary[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(35): 13056−13066.
[11]	Stein E D, Cohen Y, Winer A M. Environmental distribution and transformation of mercury compounds[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 26(1): 1−43. doi: 10.1080/10643389609388485
[12]	Mason R P, Choi A L, Fitzgerald W F, et al. Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications[J]. Environmental Research, 2012, 119: 101−117. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013
[13]	Jonsson S, Skyllberg U, Nilsson M B, et al. Mercury methylation rates for geochemically relevant Hg^II species in sediments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(21): 11653−11659.
[14]	Liem-Nguyen V, Jonsson S, Skyllberg U, et al. Effects of nutrient loading and mercury chemical speciation on the formation and degradation of methylmercury in estuarine sediment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(13): 6983−6990.
[15]	Duan Dandan, Lei Pei, Lan Wenlu, et al. Litterfall-derived organic matter enhances mercury methylation in mangrove sediments of south China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 765: 142763. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142763
[16]	Wang Yongjie, Wang Zhigang, Zheng Xiangmin, et al. Influence of Spartina alterniflora invasion on mercury storage and methylation in the sediments of Yangtze River estuarine wetlands[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2022, 265: 107717. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107717
[17]	Zhu Wei, Song Yu, Adediran G A, et al. Mercury transformations in resuspended contaminated sediment controlled by redox conditions, chemical speciation and sources of organic matter[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2018, 220: 158−179. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.045
[18]	Sharif A, Monperrus M, Tessier E, et al. Fate of mercury species in the coastal plume of the Adour River estuary (bay of Biscay, SW France)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 496: 701−713. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.116
[19]	Seelen E A, Massey G M, Mason R P. Role of sediment resuspension on estuarine suspended particulate mercury dynamics[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(14): 7736−7744.
[20]	Martı́n-Doimeadios R C R, Tessier E, Amouroux D, et al. Mercury methylation/demethylation and volatilization pathways in estuarine sediment slurries using species-specific enriched stable isotopes[J]. Marine Chemistry, 2004, 90(1/4): 107−123.
[21]	Barkay T, Gu Baohua. Demethylation-the other side of the mercury methylation coin: a critical review[J]. ACS Environmental Au, 2022, 2(2): 77−97. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00022
[22]	Yang Qingqing, Guo Yingying, Xiang Yuping, et al. Toward efficient bioremediation of methylmercury in sediment using merB overexpressed Escherichia coli[J]. Water Research, 2023, 229: 119502. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119502
[23]	Baptista-Salazar C, Liem-Nguyen V, Jonsson S. Experiments revealing the formation of refractory methylmercury pools in natural sediments and soils[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2022, 328: 76−84. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2022.04.009
[24]	Liu Maodian, Zhang Wei, Wang Xuejun, et al. Mercury release to aquatic environments from anthropogenic sources in China from 2001 to 2012[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(15): 8169−8177.
[25]	Liu Maodian, Xie Han, He Yipeng, et al. Sources and transport of methylmercury in the Yangtze River and the impact of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Water Research, 2019, 166: 115042. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115042
[26]	Cao Feng, Yang Shouye, Yin Daqiang, et al. Geochemical controls on the distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in sediments and porewater from the Yangtze River estuary to the East China Sea[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 892: 164737. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164737
[27]	沈焕庭, 潘定安. 长江河口最大浑浊带[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001: 1−50. Shen Huanting, Pan Ding'an. Turbidity Maximum in the Changjiang Estuary[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2001: 1−50. (查阅网上资料, 本条文献的出版者的英文信息未找到, 请确认)
[28]	Yang Shilun, Li H, Ysebaert T, et al. Spatial and temporal variations in sediment grain size in tidal wetlands, Yangtze delta: on the role of physical and biotic controls[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2008, 77(4): 657−671. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.10.024
[29]	Olund S D, Dewild J F, Olson M L, et al. Methods for the Preparation and Analysis of Solids and Suspended Solids for Total Mercury[M]//Techniques and Methods 5: Laboratory Analysis, Section A: Water Analysis. Reston: United States Geological Survey, 2004, 8: 15.
[30]	Munson K M, Babi D, Lamborg C H. Determination of monomethylmercury from seawater with ascorbic acid-assisted direct ethylation[J]. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2014, 12(1): 1−9. doi: 10.4319/lom.2014.12.1
[31]	Liang Lian, Horvat M, Feng Xinbin, et al. Re-evaluation of distillation and comparison with HNO₃ leaching/solvent extraction for isolation of methylmercury compounds from sediment/soil samples[J]. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2004, 18(6): 264−270. doi: 10.1002/aoc.617
[32]	Dewild J F, Olund S D, Olson M L, et al. Methods for the Preparation and Analysis of Sofids and Suspended Solids for Methylmercury[M]//Techniques and Methods 5: Laboratory Analysis, Section A: Water Analysis. Reston: United States Geological Survey, 2004, 7: 1-12.
[33]	王志刚, 周立旻, 郑祥民, 等. 长江河口湿地互花米草入侵对沉积物中汞形态特征的影响研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2021, 43(8): 31−40. Wang Zhigang, Zhou Limin, Zheng Xiangmin, et al. Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on mercury speciation in vegetated sediments of the wetland in Changjiang River estuary, China[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2021, 43(8): 31−40.
[34]	Zhao Guoqiang, Wu Binbin, Zheng Xiaoshan, et al. Tide-triggered production of reactive oxygen species in coastal soils[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(16): 11888−11896.
[35]	Drott A, Lambertsson L, Björn E, et al. Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(1): 153−158.
[36]	Ullrich S M, Tanton T W, Abdrashitova S A. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2001, 31(3): 241−293. doi: 10.1080/20016491089226
[37]	Jonsson S, Skyllberg U, Nilsson M B, et al. Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota[J]. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 4624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5624
[38]	Wadle A, Neal-Walthall N, Ndu U, et al. Distribution and homogenization of multiple mercury species inputs to freshwater wetland mesocosms[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(3): 1709−1720.
[39]	Zhu Changle, Lv Shaoyang, Zhao Qing, et al. Seasonal variation in mercury and methylmercury production in vegetated sediment in the Dongtan wetlands of the Yangtze River estuary, China[J]. Marine Environmental Research, 2023, 188: 105999. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105999
[40]	Bravo A G, Bouchet S, Tolu J, et al. Molecular composition of organic matter controls methylmercury formation in boreal lakes[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 14255. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14255
[41]	Lin Heyu, Ascher D B, Myung Y, et al. Mercury methylation by metabolically versatile and cosmopolitan marine bacteria[J]. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15(6): 1810−1825. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00889-4
[42]	Jiang Tao, Bravo A G, Skyllberg U, et al. Influence of dissolved organic matter (DOM) characteristics on dissolved mercury (Hg) species composition in sediment porewater of lakes from southwest China[J]. Water Research, 2018, 146: 146−158. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.054
[43]	Xie Fuyu, Yuan Qingke, Meng Ying, et al. Degradation of methylmercury into Hg(0) by the oxidation of iron(II) minerals[J]. Water Research, 2024, 256: 121645. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121645
[44]	Yu Chenglong, Lu Yuxi, Zhang Yanting, et al. Significant contribution of solid organic matter for hydroxyl radical production during oxygenation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(16): 11878−11887.
[45]	Wu Binbin, Zhou Chong, Zhao Guoqiang, et al. Enhanced photochemical production of reactive intermediates at the wetland soil-water interface[J]. Water Research, 2022, 223: 118971. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118971
[46]	Turner A, Millward G E, Le Roux S M. Significance of oxides and particulate organic matter in controlling trace metal partitioning in a contaminated estuary[J]. Marine Chemistry, 2004, 88(3/4): 179−192.
[47]	Gu B, Mishra B, Miller C, et al. X-ray fluorescence mapping of mercury on suspended mineral particles and diatoms in a contaminated freshwater system[J]. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11(18): 5259−5267. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-5259-2014
[48]	李道季, 李军, 陈吉余, 等. 长江河口悬浮颗粒物研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2000, 31(3): 295−301. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2000.03.010 Li Daoji, Li Jun, Chen Jiyu, et al. A study on suspended matter in the Changjiang River estuary[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2000, 31(3): 295−301. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2000.03.010