Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes

MA Hongyu; QIAO Fangli; GUO Jingsong

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Haiyang Xuebao > 2012 > 34(4): 35-40

MA Hongyu, QIAO Fangli, GUO Jingsong. Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2012, 34(4): 35-40.

Citation:

MA Hongyu, QIAO Fangli, GUO Jingsong. Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2012, 34(4): 35-40.

MA Hongyu, QIAO Fangli, GUO Jingsong. Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2012, 34(4): 35-40.

Citation:

MA Hongyu, QIAO Fangli, GUO Jingsong. Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2012, 34(4): 35-40.

PDF( 3047 KB)

Simulation and comparison of the evolution of water temperature with two turbulence parameterization schemes

Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China;First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

Received Date: 2011-07-22
Rev Recd Date: 2012-02-27

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the observed data in BaShan Lake, the evolution of observed temperature was simulated with MY2.5 parameterization scheme and κ-ε parameterization scheme under different surface boundary conditions. The simulated results were almost same with the two kinds of parameterization scheme under wind forcing surface boundary condition. When the wave breaking surface boundary condition developed by Mellor and Blumberg was considered, the simulated results with MY2.5 parameterization scheme were’t improved obviously but the results with κ-ε parameterization scheme were improved much which were similar with observed temperature profiles.
- parameterization scheme,
- boundary conditions,
- simulated results

FullText(HTML)

References(8)

References

MELLOR G L,YAMADA T. Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems [J].Rev Geophys Space Phus, 1982,20:851-875.

BURCHARD H, PETERSEN O, RIPPETH T P. Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the κ-ε two-equation turbulence models[J].J Geophys Res,1998, 103: 10543-10554.

BURCHARD H,BOLDING K. Comparative analysis of four second-moment turbulence closure models for the oceanic mixed layer[J].J Phys Oceanogr,2001,31: 1943-1968.

BURCHARD H, CRAIG P D, GEMMRICH J R, et al.Observational and numerical modeling methods for quantifying coastal ocean turbulence and mixing[J].Progress in oceanography, 2008,76:399-442.

陈景仁.湍流模型及有限分析法[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1989.

MELLOR G L,BLUMBERG A. Wave breaking and ocean surface layer thermal response[J].J Phys Oceanogr, 2004,34:693-698.

BURCHARD H. Simulating the wave-enhanced layer under breaking surface waves with two-equation turbulence models[J].J Phys Oceanogr, 2001,31:3133-3145.

STACEY M W. Simulation of the wind-forced near-surface circulation in Knight-Inlet: a parameterization of the roughness length[J].J Phys Oceanogr, 1999,29:1363-1367.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views