Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
GUO Ming-lan, SU Yong-quan, CHEN Xiao-feng, DING Shao-xiong, WANG Jun. Comparative studies on morphology of Epinephelus moara and E.bruneus[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2008, 30(6): 106-114.
Citation: GUO Ming-lan, SU Yong-quan, CHEN Xiao-feng, DING Shao-xiong, WANG Jun. Comparative studies on morphology of Epinephelus moara and E.bruneus[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2008, 30(6): 106-114.

Comparative studies on morphology of Epinephelus moara and E.bruneus

  • Received Date: 2008-01-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2008-08-24
  • To identify the animal species accurately is very important for both biologist and farmer.Groupers are of considerable importance in the commercial and artisanal fisheries in tropical and subtropical seas.It presents certain difficulties and confusions in the identification of the species.For example, whether E.moara and E.bruneus, with the closely similarity in outer shape and distribution belong to one species or not, has being existed the argument for a long time.The int erspecific differences between them were mainly identified on the basis of the skeleton system as well as the meristic and morphometric characters.The results revealed as the follow ings: (1) Although their outer shape, color and bands were very similar, the bars on the body were different.By means of the Fisher Discrim inant Function Analysis, statistically significant difference would be found to exist between E.moara and E.bruneus (p < 0.001) in meristic and morphometric characters, such as the ratios of body length/snout-vent length, dorsal fin coxal length/anal fin coxal length and head length/diameter of eyes, the numbers of dorsal fin rays, gill rakers and pyloric caeca; (2) They were basically homologous on the configuration and composition of neurocranium, splanchnocranium, vertebrate, rib and appendicular skeleton, but there were many remarkably differences: Preorbital, Post-orbital, Preoperculare, Urohyal, Predorsal interneural spine and the connection of Hypurals and Caudal spine and so on.As we known, these skeletons could also be used as the important characters to identify genera or species in fishes.Accordingly, we considered that E.moara and E.bruneus were different species in the same genus.
  • loading
  • HEEMSTRA P C,RANDALL J E.Groupers of the world[M].Rome:FAO Species Catalogue,1993:119-120.
    沈世杰.台湾鱼类志[M].台湾:台湾大学动物学系印行,1993:683.
    BURGESS W,AXELROAD H R.Pacific Marine Fishes(Book 1)[M].New Jersey:T F H Publications,1971:280.
    成庆泰,郑葆珊.中国鱼类系统检索(上册)[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:290.
    王以康.鱼类分类学[M].上海:科技卫生出版社,1958:230-232.
    冯昭信.鲈鱼Lateolabrax japonicus(Cuvier &Valenciennes)骨骼系统的形态观察[J].大连水产学院学报,1982,1:29-52.
    MIKE S,RTSCH G,WESTON J,et al.Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels[M]∥HU Y-H LARSEN J,WILSON E,et al.Neural Networks for Signal Processing,Ⅸ[M].New York:IEEE Press,1999:41-48.
    BERG L S.Classification of Fishes both Resent and Fossil,2ed[M].Trav Inst Zool.Acad Sci U R S S,1955,20:1-286.
    BALDWIN C C,JOHNSON G D.Phylogeny of the Epinephelinae(Teleostei:Serranidae)[J].Bull.Mar.Sci.1993,52(1):240-283.
    张其永,洪万树,邵广昭.网箱养殖卵形鲳鯵和布氏鲳鯵分类性状的研究[J].台湾海峡,2000,19(4):499-506.
    李仲辉.游鳍叶鲹和镰鳍裸胸鲹骨骼系统的比较研究[J].海洋湖沼通报,2002,1:38-48.
    丁少雄,王颖汇,王军,等.基于16S rDNA部分序列探讨中国近海30种石斑鱼类的分子系统进化关系[J].动物学报,2006,52(3):504-513.
    庄轩,丁少雄,郭丰,等.基于细胞色素b基因片段序列研究中国近海石斑鱼类系统进化关系[J].中国科学(C辑),2006,36(1):27-34.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1681) PDF downloads(1670) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return