Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
Hao Guanghua,Yang Qinghua,Zhao Jiechen, et al. Observation and analysis of landfast ice arounding Zhongshan Station, Antarctic in 2016[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2019, 41(9):26–39,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253−4193.2019.09.003
Citation: Hao Guanghua,Yang Qinghua,Zhao Jiechen, et al. Observation and analysis of landfast ice arounding Zhongshan Station, Antarctic in 2016[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2019, 41(9):26–39,doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253−4193. 2019.09.003

Observation and analysis of landfast ice arounding Zhongshan Station, Antarctic in 2016

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2019.09.003
  • Received Date: 2018-07-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-01-07
  • Available Online: 2021-04-21
  • Publish Date: 2019-09-25
  • Sea ice is an important part of the global climate system. Landfast ice is commonly found in the Antarctic coastal area, which reached the thickest in the middle and late November around Zhongshan Station. Sea ice thickness is one of the important parameters of the sea ice. We presented measurements by taken 1 SIMBA (Snow and Ice Mass Balance Array) buoy and 3 TY buoys to monitor ice thickness based on the bias of different linear temperature gradient in air, snow, ice and sea water in three different landfast ice stations (S1, S2 and S3) in the Prydz Bay outside Zhongshan Station in 2016. The SIMBA measures vertical temperature profiles 4 times a day and TY measures vertical temperature per hour. Both SIMBA and TY buoys were set up in S3 station. Compared with borehole in situ measurements, the ice thickness derived by TY buoys had a mean bias and RMSE of 3.3 cm and 14.7 cm in S1 Station, 6.6 cm and 6.9 cm in S2 Station and 4.0 cm and 4.8 cm in S3 Station. And the mean bias and RMSE for the SIMBA buoys in S3 Station compared with borehole in situ measurements were 8.2 cm and 9.7 cm. The sea ice thickness derived by TY buoys were more agreement with the borehole in situ measurements compared with the sea ice thickness derives from SIMBA buoys in S3 Station. The result of Stefan’s law of ice growth model shows the sea ice growth process and the ice growth rate varied between 0.1 cm/d to 0.8 cm/d, which is faster than the result of TY buoys and is affected by the snow thickness. While compare with limited borehole in situ sea ice thickness measurements and the great uncertain in the sea ice thickness derived by remote sense data, the error for both the TY and SIMBA buoys are reasonable, which will benefit to the future sea ice thickness monitor near Zhongshan Station.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Serreze M C, Maslanik J A, Scambos T A, et al. A record minimum Arctic sea ice extent and area in 2002[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(3): 1110. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016406
    [2]
    Liu Jiping, Curry J A, Hu Yongyun. Recent Arctic sea ice variability: connections to the Arctic oscillation and the ENSO[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(9): L09211.
    [3]
    Massom R A, Stammerjohn S E. Antarctic sea ice change and variability – Physical and ecological implications[J]. Polar Science, 2010, 4(2): 149−186. doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2010.05.001
    [4]
    Perovich D K, Grenfell T C, Richter-Menge J A, et al. Thin and thinner: sea ice mass balance measurements during SHEBA[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003, 108(C3): SHE 26.
    [5]
    Maslanik J, Stroeve J, Fowler C, et al. Distribution and trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(13): L13502.
    [6]
    Holland M M, Stroeve J. Changing seasonal sea ice predictor relationships in a changing Arctic climate[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(18): L18501.
    [7]
    Comiso J C. Large decadal decline of the Arctic multiyear ice cover[J]. Journal of Climate, 2012, 25(4): 1176−1193. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00113.1
    [8]
    Comiso J C, Parkinson C L, Gersten R, et al. Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35(1): L01703.
    [9]
    Comiso J C, Hall D K. Climate trends in the Arctic as observed from space[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2014, 5(3): 389−409. doi: 10.1002/wcc.277
    [10]
    Cavalieri D J, Parkinson C L, Vinnikov K Y. 30-Year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(18): 1970.
    [11]
    Liu Jiping, Curry J A, Martinson D G. Interpretation of recent Antarctic sea ice variability[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(2): L02205.
    [12]
    Stammerjohn S E, Martinson D G, Smith R C, et al. Trends in Antarctic annual sea ice retreat and advance and their relation to El Niño-Southern Oscillation and southern annular mode variability[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2008, 113(C3): C03S90.
    [13]
    Parkinson C L, Cavalieri D J. Antarctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979−2010[J]. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2012, 6(2): 931−956. doi: 10.5194/tcd-6-931-2012
    [14]
    Holland P R. The seasonality of Antarctic sea ice trends[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014, 41(12): 4230−4237. doi: 10.1002/2014GL060172
    [15]
    Massom R A, Eicken H, Hass C, et al. Snow on Antarctic sea ice[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2001, 39(3): 413−445. doi: 10.1029/2000RG000085
    [16]
    Cavalieri D J, Parkinson C L. Antarctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979-2006[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Ocean, 2008, 113(C7): C07004.
    [17]
    Holland P R, Bruneau N, Enright C, et al. Modeled trends in Antarctic sea ice thickness[J]. Journal of Climate, 2014, 27(10): 3784−3801. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00301.1
    [18]
    Kurtz N T, Markus T. Satellite observations of Antarctic sea ice thickness and volume[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2012, 117(C8): C08025.
    [19]
    Allison I, Brandt R E, Warren S G. East Antarctic sea ice: Albedo, thickness distribution, and snow cover[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1993, 98(C7): 12417−12429. doi: 10.1029/93JC00648
    [20]
    Worby A P, Geiger C A, Paget M J, et al. Thickness distribution of Antarctic sea ice[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2008, 113(C5): C05S92.
    [21]
    Reid J E, Worby A P, Vrbancich J, et al. Shipborne electromagnetic measurements of Antarctic sea-ice thickness[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(5): 1537−1546. doi: 10.1190/1.1620627
    [22]
    Fedotov V I, Cherepanov N V, Tyshko K P. Some features of the growth, structure and metamorphism of east Antarctic Landfast sea ice[M]//Jeffries M O. Antarctic Sea: Ice Physical Processes, Interactions and Variability. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 1998: 343–354.
    [23]
    Lei Ruibo, Li Zhijun, Cheng Bin, et al. Annual cycle of landfast sea ice in Prydz Bay, east Antarctica[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2010, 115(C2): C02006.
    [24]
    Heil P, Gerland S, Granskog M A. An Antarctic monitoring initiative for fast ice and comparison with the Arctic[J]. The Cryosphere Discuss, 2011, 5(5): 2437−2463. doi: 10.5194/tcd-5-2437-2011
    [25]
    雷瑞波, 李志军, 秦建敏, 等. 定点冰厚观测新技术研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(2): 287−292. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2009.02.021

    Lei Ruibo, Li Zhijun, Qin Jianmin, et al. Investigation of new technologies for in-situ ice thickness observation[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009, 20(2): 287−292. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2009.02.021
    [26]
    郭井学, 孙波, 田钢, 等. 南极普里兹湾海冰厚度的电磁感应探测方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(2): 596−602. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.02.033

    Guo Jingxue, Sun Bo, Tian Gang, et al. Research on electromagnetic inductive measurement of sea-ice thickness in Antarctic Prydz Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(2): 596−602. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.02.033
    [27]
    雷瑞波, 李志军, 窦银科, 等. 南极中山站附近固定冰生消过程观测[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(5): 708−712.

    Lei Ruibo, Li Zhijun, Dou Yinke, et al. Observations of the growth and decay processes of fast ice around Zhongshan Station in Antarctica[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(5): 708−712.
    [28]
    赵杰臣, 杨清华, 程斌, 等. 基于温度链浮标获取南极普里兹湾积雪和固定冰厚度的研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2017, 39(11): 115−127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2017.11.011

    Zhao Jiechen, Yang Qinghua, Cheng Bin, et al. Snow and land-fast sea ice thickness derived from thermistor chain buoy in the Prydz Bay, Antarctic[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2017, 39(11): 115−127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2017.11.011
    [29]
    Tian Zhongxiang, Cheng Bin, Zhao Jiechen, et al. Observed and modelled snow and ice thickness in the Arctic Ocean with CHINARE buoy data[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2017, 36(8): 66−75. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1020-4
    [30]
    Stefan J. Ueber die theorie der eisbildung, insbesondere über die eisbildung im polarmeere[J]. Annalen Der Physik, 1891, 278(2): 269−286. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3889
    [31]
    Leppäranta M. Freezing of Lakes and the Evolution of Their Ice Cover[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.
    [32]
    Maksym T, Markus T. Antarctic sea ice thickness and snow-to-ice conversion from atmospheric reanalysis and passive microwave snow depth[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2008, 113(C2): C02S12.
    [33]
    Tang Shulin, Kang Jiancheng, Zhou Shangzhe, et al. Sea ice characteristics between the middle Weddell Sea and the Prydz Bay, Antarctica during the austral summer of 2003[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2005, 24(2): 9−15.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(15)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (429) PDF downloads(182) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return