Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
Chen Jian, Jiang Zhuhui, Su Xingtao, Yan Hengqian, Song Bo, An Yuzhu, Lu Kaicheng. Prescribed error estimation and diagnostic analysis in reconstruction of 3-D ocean temperature field from multi-source data[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2018, 40(4): 15-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.04.002
Citation: Chen Jian, Jiang Zhuhui, Su Xingtao, Yan Hengqian, Song Bo, An Yuzhu, Lu Kaicheng. Prescribed error estimation and diagnostic analysis in reconstruction of 3-D ocean temperature field from multi-source data[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2018, 40(4): 15-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.04.002

Prescribed error estimation and diagnostic analysis in reconstruction of 3-D ocean temperature field from multi-source data

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.04.002
  • Received Date: 2016-10-10
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-11-10
  • To reconstruct 3-D ocean temperature fields using both satellite measurements and in situ observations, the prescribed statistical information estimation in the optimal interpolation (OI) was optimized and the impact mechanisms of these two types of data were analysed. In the OI, two comparative schemes were implemented, with the background field set to a climatology (static scheme) and a synthetic field from satellite surface data (dynamic scheme), respectively. Before the OI, one a posterior diagnosis iterative method was performed to optimize the background error and observation error covariances. After the OI, the two schemes were compared using some diagnostic errors in the observational space and indices on the model grids. The main conclusions include:(1) The analysis error is smaller for the dynamic scheme than for the static one, in which the reduced absolute quantity is determined by the differences in their observation errors (i.e., noises), and the reduced relative extent is determined by the differences in their background errors (i.e., signals). (2) The background term is more important in the high and middle latitudes, and equivalent to the observation term along the equator, which is determined by the qusi-zonally-orientated distributed covariance scales. (3) The dynamic fields have higher spectral energy related to the temperature mesoscale signal features than the static fields by 1-3 orders of magnitude overall, but roughly the same in the tropics. (4) Satellite measurements reduces the total error and increase the effective resolution of the analysis field by resolving the mesoscale features that in situ observations cannot resolve well.
  • loading
  • Fox D N, Teague W J, Barron C N, et al. The modular ocean data assimilation system (MODAS)[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2002, 19(2):240-252.
    Buongiorno N B, Santoleri R. Methods for the reconstruction of vertical profiles from surface data:Multivariate analyses, residual GEM, and variable temporal signals in the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2005, 22(11):1762-1781.
    Guinehut S, Le Traon P Y, Larnicol G, et al. Combining Argo and remote-sensing data to estimate the ocean three-dimensional temperature fields-A first approach based on simulated observations[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2004, 46(1/4):85-98.
    Guinehut S, Dhomps A L, Larnicol G, et al. High resolution 3-D temperature and salinity fields derived from in situ and satellite observations[J]. Ocean Science Discussions, 2012, 9(2):1313-1347.
    Buongiorno N B, Guinehut S, Pascual A, et al. Towards high resolution mapping of 3-D mesoscale dynamics from observations[J]. Ocean Science, 2012, 8(5):885-901.
    Hollingsworth A, Lönnberg P. The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part Ⅰ:The wind field[J]. Tellus A:Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 1986, 38(2):111-136.
    Dee D P, Da Silva A. Maximum-likelihood estimation of forecast and observation error covariance parameters. Part I:Methodology[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1999, 127(8):1822-1834.
    Desroziers G, Ivanov S. Diagnosis and adaptive tuning of observation-error parameters in a variational assimilation[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2001, 127(574):1433-1452.
    Chapnik B, Desroziers G, Rabier F, et al. Diagnosis and tuning of observational error statistics in a quasioperational data assimilation setting[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2006, 132(615):543-565.
    Gaillard F. ISAS-Tool Version 6:Configuration[R]. Rapport LPO, 2011.
    Gaillard F, Autret E, Thierry V, et al. Quality control of large Argo data sets[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009, 26(2):337-351.
    Reynolds R W, Smith T M, Liu C Y, et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature[J]. Journal of Climate, 2007, 20(22):5473-5496.
    Desroziers G, Berre L, Chapnik B, et al. Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2005, 131(613):3385-3396.
    Von Schuckmann K, Gaillard F, Le Traon P Y. Global hydrographic variability patterns during 2003-2008[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2009, 114(C9):C09007.
    安玉柱,张韧,王辉赞,等. 全球大洋混合层深度的计算及其时空变化特征分析. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(7):2249-2258. An Yuzhu, Zhang Ren, Wang Huzan, et al. Study on calculation and spatio-temporal variations of global ocean mixed layer depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(7):2249-2258.
    Roemmich D, Gilson J. The 2004-2008 mean and annual cycle of temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo Program[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2009, 82(2):81-100.
    Reynolds R W, Chelton D B. Comparisons of daily sea surface temperature analyses for 2007-2008[J]. Journal of Climate, 2010, 23(13):3545-3562.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (799) PDF downloads(427) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return