Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!
| Full name | |
|---|---|
| Phone number | |
| Title | |
| |
| Citation: | Shen Qi, Gao Qinqin, Gu Fengfeng, Qi Dingman. Analysis of the sediment motion at north passage in flood and dry season after 3rd phase engineering of the deep waterways in Changjiang Estuary[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2014, 36(7): 118-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2014.07.013
|
In this paper, the sediment motion at north passage has been analyzed on the basis of the observations of water current and sediment concentration before and after the third phase engineering of the deep waterways in Changjiang Estuary. The result shows that:the distribution of the sediment concentration of north passage in both flood and dry season appears low-high-low pattern from the upper stream to the down stream where the midstream region of north passage has the highest sediment concentration. The correlation of sediment concentration and water current averaged in a tide cycle is poor in the flood season so that the sediment advection.plays a more important role in north passage while in the dry season, the correlation is good so that the sediment suspension plays more. The main form of sediment transport in north passage is the lagrangian advection. The net sediment transport in the flood season is bigger than the dry season. The tidal pumping effect as well as the vertical-circulation effect are big in the midstream of north passage in the flood season while in the dry season, they are so small that make the water and sediment move nearly in the same direction excluding the upper stream of north passage. The reason that the tidal pumping effect as well as the vertical-circulation effect play an important roles in the midstream of north passage is that the sediment exchanging is very frequent in the midstream of north passage where there exist a high concentration of sediment flowed into north passage generated from both the mouth bar of south passage and Jiuduansha tidal shoal in a flood tide.
|
交通部长江口航道管理局.长江口深水航道治理工程成套技术(总报告)[R].2006.
|
|
刘杰, 乐嘉海, 胡志峰, 等.长江口深水航道治理一期工程实施对北槽拦门沙的影响[J].海洋工程, 2003, 21(2):58—64.
|
|
刘杰, 陈吉余, 乐嘉海, 等.长江口深水航道治理一期工程实施后北槽冲淤分析[J].泥沙研究, 2004, (5):15—22.
|
|
杜景龙, 杨世伦, 张文祥, 等.长江口北槽深水航道工程对九段沙冲淤影响研究[J].海洋工程, 2005, 23(3):79—83.
|
|
杜景龙, 杨世伦.长江口北槽深水航道工程对周主槽涂冲淤影响研究[J].地理科学, 2007, 27(03):390—394.
|
|
王兆华, 杜景龙. 长江口深水航道一、二期工程建设以来北槽河段的冲淤演变[J]. 海洋通报, 2006, 25(06):55—62.
|
|
张国安, 虞志英, 何青, 等. 长江口深水航道治理一期工程前后泥沙运动特性初步分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2003, (06):31—38.
|
|
Li Lu, Zhu Jianrong, Wu Hui. Impacts of wind stress on saltwater intrusion in the Yangtze Estuary[J]. Science China(Earth Sciences), 2012, 55(07):1178—1192.
|
|
吉晓强, 何青, 刘红, 等. 崇明东滩水文泥沙过程分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2010, (01):46—57.
|
|
王康, 苏纪兰.长江口南港环流及悬移物质输运的计算方法[J].海洋学报, 1987, 9(5):627—637.
|
|
石伟荣, 李九发. 长江河口南北槽输沙机制及浑浊带发育分析[J].海洋通报, 1993, 12(4):69—76.
|
|
沈健, 沈焕庭, 潘定安, 等.长江河口最大浑浊带水沙输运机制分析[J].地理学报, 1995, 50(5):411—420.
|
|
沈焕庭, 等.长江河口物质通量[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2001.
|
|
吴家学, 沈焕庭, 吴华林.潮汐河口悬沙通量组分模式及其在长江口的应用[J].海洋学报, 2002, 24(6):49—58.
|
|
刘高峰, 朱建荣, 沈焕庭.河口涨落潮槽水沙输运机制研究[J].泥沙研究, 2005, (5):51—57.
|
|
英晓明, 丁平兴. 洋山港海域水体和悬沙输运机制研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2011, 30(2): 135—141.
|
|
朱首贤, 丁平兴, 沙文钰, 等. 河口物质和水体长期输运分离的理论分析和观测验证:Ⅰ.物质和水体长期输运分离的理论分析[J]. 海洋学报, 2008, 30(6):24—29.
|
|
沈淇, 顾峰峰, 戚定满, 等. 洋山港及邻近海域悬沙输运特征研究[J]. 水运工程, 2012, (6):21—27.
|
DownLoad: