Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
An Cheng, Wang Yunfeng, Yuan Jinnan, Cheng Xiaoping, Han Yueqi. A new method for analyzing track forecast error of typhoon[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2014, 36(5): 46-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2014.05.005
Citation: An Cheng, Wang Yunfeng, Yuan Jinnan, Cheng Xiaoping, Han Yueqi. A new method for analyzing track forecast error of typhoon[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2014, 36(5): 46-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2014.05.005

A new method for analyzing track forecast error of typhoon

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2014.05.005
  • Received Date: 2013-04-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-01-02
  • Typhoon track forecast error should include distance error and direction error, but in previous operational application and scientific research in favor only consider the distance error between observation position and forecast position of the corresponding time. In this paper the method of assessing the typhoon track error was improved. A new method of characterization of typhoon track error multiple-factor error method is established based on the distance error. The tropical cyclone(TC) best track data which compiled by Chinese Meteorological Administration(CMA) were as the standard, the TC tracks in the western North Pacific forecasted by CMA, U S Joint Typhoon Warning Center and Japan Meteorological Agency in 2008 and 2009, were analyzed by using the new multiple-factor method that attributes TC track forecast error, and with the distance error method which uses generally was compared. The results show that the quite obvious difference exists between the multiple-factor error analysis method and distance error analysis method. The multiple-factor error method superiority is quite obvious. It is an useful exploration to the more scientific assessment method for typhoon track forecast error. It has a certain practice application value.
  • loading
  • 李佳, 余晖, 应明, 等. 2007年西北太平洋热带气旋定位和预报精度评定[J].气象, 2009:35(2):101-105.
    谭燕, 余晖, 占瑞芬. 2008年西北太平洋热带气旋定位和预报精度评定[J].大气科学研究与应用, 2009, 2:52-61.
    占瑞芬, 汤杰, 余晖. 2009年西北太平洋热带气旋定位和业务预报精度评定[J].气象, 2010, 36(10):114-121.
    Hogan T F, Pauley R L. The impact of convective momentum transport on tropical cyclone Track Forecasts using the emanuel cumulus parameterization[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2007, 135(4):1195-1207.
    吴俞, 麻素红, 肖天贵, 等. T213L31模式热带气旋路径数值预报误差分析[J].应用气象学报, 2011, 22(2):183-193.
    汤杰. 西北太平洋台风路径业务预报误差初步分析[J].大气科学研究与应用, 2009, 17(2):21-31.
    张小雯, 应明. 热带气旋路径资料的差异性[J].海洋预报, 2009, 26(3):60-70.
    马雷鸣, 李佳, 黄伟, 等. 2007年国内台风模式路径预报效果评估[J].气象, 2008, 34(10):74-79.
    李永平. 0917号台风路径分析[J].气象研究与应用, 2010, 31(1):28-32.
    James S G, Charles R S, James M G. A history of western North Pacific tropical cyclone Track Forecast skill[J]. Weather& Forcasting, 2004, 19(3):633-638.
    James S G. Prediction of Consensus Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast Error[J].Mon Wea Rev, 2007, 135(5):1985-1993.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (2037) PDF downloads(1903) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return