Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MA Tianyi,ZHI Hai,ZHANG Ronghua, et al. Prediction and correction of ENSO using an intelligent Air-Sea coupling model based on the Transformer architecture[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2025, 47(6):1–14 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025061
Citation: MA Tianyi,ZHI Hai,ZHANG Ronghua, et al. Prediction and correction of ENSO using an intelligent Air-Sea coupling model based on the Transformer architecture[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2025, 47(6):1–14 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025061

Prediction and correction of ENSO using an intelligent Air-Sea coupling model based on the Transformer architecture

doi: 10.12284/hyxb2025061
  • Received Date: 2025-01-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-04-29
  • Available Online: 2025-06-03
  • El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), as the most prominent interannual variability signal in the climate system, exerts significant impacts on global weather and climate. Under global warming, ENSO evolution has increasingly exhibited the characteristics of complex and diverse rendering its simulation and prediction a particularly challenging subject within climatology. This study introduces 3D-Geoformer, an advanced multi-variable intelligent prediction model for the tropical sea-air system based on Transformer architecture, to conduct error analysis and correction research for ENSO predictions. Unlike many existing models that focus solely on univariate fields or time series related to ENSO, the 3D-Geoformer model achieves accurate characterization and prediction of the multi-variable three-dimensional field of the tropical Pacific sea-air system while preserving the integrity of the physical processes essential for ENSO prediction. To address specific issues in ENSO predictions by the 3D-Geoformer model, such as low spring forecasting skills, weak SST forecasting ability in the western equatorial Pacific, and inadequate forecasting intensity for extreme ENSO events, this study proposes a seasonal forecasting error correction technique based on empirical orthogonal function (EOF) decomposition. This method is applied to correct the prediction results of the 3D-Geoformer model. During the construction phase of the correction relationship, EOF analysis was used to establish the linear relationship between the principal component sequences of the multivariable prediction field and the prediction error field from 1983 to 2009. Subsequently, this relationship was utilized for subsequent error corrections. In the testing phase, the EOF principal component coefficients of the prediction field and their linear relationships with the main components of the error were employed to calculate the corresponding principal components of the prediction error, thereby obtaining the prediction error field and the corrected prediction field. The experimental results indicate that when the 3D-Geoformer model is employed for forecasting the sea - surface temperature (SST) in the western equatorial Pacific, the prediction error remains below 0.15 °C. Notably, the prediction bias of the 3D-Geoformer model regarding the sea temperature in the western equatorial Pacific, induced by the “cold tongue bias” inherent in climate models, is substantially mitigated. Concurrently, there is a remarkable 46.7% reduction in the prediction error of the sea-surface temperature (SST) in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific. Through a meticulous comparison of the disparities in the anomaly correlation coefficients (ACC) between the SST prediction outcomes of the 3D-Geoformer model with and without Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) correction in the equatorial Pacific, it is discerned that positive-value regions are consistently present in the ACC differences. This finding strongly suggests that the EOF-corrected model exhibits enhanced prediction accuracy, effectively alleviating the “cold tongue bias” issue arising from the utilization of climate model data from the Sixth Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (CMIP6) during the training phase of the 3D-Geoformer model. For the 2015−2016 El Niño event, forecast corrections made 12 months in advance show that the SST error in the western equatorial Pacific is controlled within 0.5°C, and the SST error in the eastern equatorial Pacific is reduced by approximately 75%, with the error range narrowed to within ±0.5°C. This study underscores the application value of the seasonal forecast error correction method based on EOF decomposition in enhancing model prediction accuracy, providing a novel approach to improving the precision of ENSO intelligent predictions, and offering new insights into simulation prediction and error analysis in earth science.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Zhang Ronghua, Rothstein L M, Busalacchi A J. Origin of upper-ocean warming and El Niño change on decadal scales in the tropical Pacific Ocean[J]. Nature, 1998, 391(6670): 879−883. doi: 10.1038/36081
    [2]
    Capotondi A, Wittenberg A T, Newman M, et al. Understanding ENSO diversity[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2015, 96(6): 921−938. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1
    [3]
    Zhang Ronghua, Yu Yongqiang, Song Zhenya, et al. A review of progress in coupled ocean-atmosphere model developments for ENSO studies in China[J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2020, 38(4): 930−961. doi: 10.1007/s00343-020-0157-8
    [4]
    陈明诚. 厄尔尼诺和拉尼娜生命史不对称机理研究[J]. 气象学报, 2017, 25(2): 67−70. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献信息, 请确认)

    Chen Mingcheng. Research on the asymmetric mechanisms of the life cycles of El Niño and La Niña[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2017, 25(2): 67−70.
    [5]
    高川, 陈茂楠, 周路, 等. 2020—2021年热带太平洋持续性双拉尼娜事件的演变[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2022, 52(12): 2353-2372.

    Gao Chuan, Chen Maonan, Zhou Lu, et al. The 2020–2021 prolonged La Niña evolution in the tropical Pacific[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(12): 2248-2266.
    [6]
    Yeh S W, Kug J S, Dewitte B, et al. El Niño in a changing climate[J]. Nature, 2009, 461(7263): 511−514. doi: 10.1038/nature08316
    [7]
    Timmermann A, An S I, Kug J S, et al. El Niño-Southern Oscillation complexity[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7715): 535−545. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0252-6
    [8]
    Zhang Ronghua, Gao Chuan, Feng Licheng. Recent ENSO evolution and its real-time prediction challenges[J]. National Science Review, 2022, 9(4): nwac052. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac052
    [9]
    张荣华. 用于厄尔尼诺-南方涛动(ENSO)研究的海气耦合模式综述: 中间型和混合型模式[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2024, 55(1): 1−23.

    Zhang Ronghua. A review of progress in coupled ocean-atmosphere model developments for Enso studies: intermediate coupled models and hybrid coupled models[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2024, 55(1): 1−23.
    [10]
    Chen Dake, Cane M A, Kaplan A, et al. Predictability of El Niño over the past 148 years[J]. Nature, 2004, 428(6984): 733−736. doi: 10.1038/nature02439
    [11]
    Tang Youmin, Zhang Ronghua, Liu Ting, et al. Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability study[J]. National Science Review, 2018, 5(6): 826−839. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy105
    [12]
    Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl G A, et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016, 9(5): 1937−1958. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
    [13]
    Luo Jingjia, Masson S, Behera S K, et al. Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean–atmosphere model[J]. Journal of Climate, 2008, 21(1): 84−93. doi: 10.1175/2007JCLI1412.1
    [14]
    Ding Ruiqiang, Tseng Y H, Di Lorenzo E, et al. Multi-year El Niño events tied to the North Pacific Oscillation[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 3871. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31516-9
    [15]
    Zhu Jieshun, Kumar A, Huang Bohua, et al. The role of off -equatorial surface temperature anomalies in the 2014 El Niño prediction[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 19677. doi: 10.1038/srep19677
    [16]
    Dong Changming, Xu Guangjun, Han Guoqing, et al. Recent developments in artificial intelligence in oceanography[J]. Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Research, 2022, 2022: 9870950.
    [17]
    Zheng Gang, Li Xiaofeng, Zhang Ronghua, et al. Purely satellite data-driven deep learning forecast of complicated tropical instability waves[J]. Science Advance, 2020, 6(29): eaba1482.
    [18]
    Zhu Yuchao, Zhang Ronghua, Moum J N, et al. Physics-informed deep-learning parameterization of ocean vertical mixing improves climate simulations[J]. National Science Review, 2022, 9(8): nwac044. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac044
    [19]
    Zhou Lu, Zhang Ronghua. A hybrid neural network model for ENSO prediction in combination with principal oscillation pattern analyses[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2022, 39(6): 889−902. doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1368-4
    [20]
    Taylor J, Feng Ming. A deep learning model for forecasting global monthly mean sea surface temperature anomalies[J]. Frontiers in Climate, 2022, 4: 932932. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2022.932932
    [21]
    Gong Bing, Langguth M, Ji Yan, et al. Temperature forecasting by deep learning methods[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2022, 15(23): 8931−8956. doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-8931-2022
    [22]
    Mu Bin, Cui Yuehan, Yuan Shijin, et al. Simulation, precursor analysis and targeted observation sensitive area identification for two types of ENSO using ENSO-MC v1.0[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2022, 15(10): 4105−4127. doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-4105-2022
    [23]
    Devlin J, Chang Mingwei, Lee K, et al. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Minneapolis: ACL, 2019.
    [24]
    Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations. OpenReview. net, 2021. (查阅网上资料, 未找到对应的出版地信息, 请确认)
    [25]
    Zhou Lu, Zhang Ronghua. A self-attention–based neural network for three-dimensional multivariate modeling and its skillful ENSO predictions[J]. Science Advances, 2023, 9(10): eadf2827. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf2827
    [26]
    Ham Y G, Kim J H, Kim E S, et al. Unified deep learning model for El Niño/Southern oscillation forecasts by incorporating seasonality in climate data[J]. Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(13): 1358−1366. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2021.03.009
    [27]
    秦正坤, 林朝晖, 陈红, 等. 基于EOF/SVD的短期气候预测误差订正方法及其应用[J]. 气象学报, 2011, 69(2): 289−296. doi: 10.11676/qxxb2011.024

    Qin Zhengkun, Lin Zhaohui, Chen Hong, et al. The bias correction methods based on the EOF/SVD for short-term climate prediction and their applications[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2011, 69(2): 289−296. doi: 10.11676/qxxb2011.024
    [28]
    Yu Yue, Lin Zhaohui, Qin Zhengkun. Improved EOF-based bias correction method for seasonal forecasts and its application in IAP AGCM4.1[J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2018, 11(6): 499−508. doi: 10.1080/16742834.2018.1529532
    [29]
    姚方玲, 秦正坤, 林朝晖, 等. 基于旋转经验正交分解的流域降水气候预测误差订正方法[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2023, 28(3): 327−342. doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2022.22071

    Yao Fangling, Qin Zhengkun, Lin Zhaohui, et al. Bias correction method based on rotated empirical orthogonal function for seasonal precipitation prediction on basin scale[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2023, 28(3): 327−342. doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2022.22071
    [30]
    Zhang Ronghua, Zhou Lu, Gao Chuan, et al. A transformer-based coupled ocean-atmosphere model for ENSO studies[J]. Science Bulletin, 2024, 69(15): 2323−2327. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.04.048
    [31]
    Newman M, Sardeshmukh P D. Are we near the predictability limit of tropical Indo-Pacific sea surface temperatures?[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(16): 8520−8529. doi: 10.1002/2017GL074088
    [32]
    郑依玲, 陈泽生, 王海, 等. 2015/2016年超强厄尔尼诺事件基本特征及生成和消亡机制[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(4): 10−19.

    Zheng Yiling, Chen Zesheng, Wang Hai, et al. Features of 2015/2016 extreme El Niño event and its evolution mechanisms[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2019, 38(4): 10−19.
    [33]
    Rivera Tello G A, Takahashi K, Karamperidou C. Explained predictions of strong eastern Pacific El Niño events using deep learning[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 21150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45739-3
    [34]
    Xu Zichun, Zhao Yang, Deng Zhongwen. The possibilities and limits of AI in Chinese judicial judgment[J]. AI & Society, 2022, 37(4): 1601−1611.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (24) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return