Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
Volume 45 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhao Wencheng,Lin Wenming,He Yijun, et al. Joint retrieval of wind and current using airborne Doppler scatterometer[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2023, 45(12):112–120 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2023169
Citation: Zhao Wencheng,Lin Wenming,He Yijun, et al. Joint retrieval of wind and current using airborne Doppler scatterometer[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2023, 45(12):112–120 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2023169

Joint retrieval of wind and current using airborne Doppler scatterometer

doi: 10.12284/hyxb2023169
  • Received Date: 2023-09-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-10-29
  • Available Online: 2023-12-29
  • Publish Date: 2023-12-01
  • Doppler scatterometer is able to measure radar backscattering coefficient and Doppler frequency over sea surface, such that it can be used to retrieve sea surface wind and sea surface current simultaneously. This paper performs a study on the joint wind and current retrieval based on the observation data from an airborne Doppler scatterometer, which results are compared with those of independent retrieval. The results indicate that the accuracy of sea surface current is significantly improved by introducing the radar backscattering coefficients into the joint inversion method, however, the accuracy of the retrieved wind field from the joint inversion method is slightly lower than that of the independent wind inversion, compared to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts winds. This implies that the Doppler information has little influence on the wind retrieval, while the radar backscattering coefficients (the wind) have a remarkable impact on the sea surface current retrieval. The joint inversion algorithm can mitigates the effects of sea surface wind for the current retrieval. The results of this study provide a new insight to the interplay between wind inversion and current retrieval, and also provide a reference for the data processing of spaceborne Doppler scatterometer.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Omand M M, D’Asaro E A, Lee C M, et al. Eddy-driven subduction exports particulate organic carbon from the spring bloom[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6231): 222−225. doi: 10.1126/science.1260062
    [2]
    Renault L, Molemaker M J, Gula J, et al. Control and stabilization of the gulf stream by oceanic current interaction with the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2016, 46(11): 3439−3453. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-16-0115.1
    [3]
    Chen Ru, Flierl G R, Wunsch C. A description of local and nonlocal eddy-mean flow interaction in a global eddy-permitting state estimate[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2014, 44(9): 2336−2352. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-14-0009.1
    [4]
    Stoffelen A, Kumar R, Zou Juhong, et al. Ocean surface vector wind observations[M]//Barale V, Gade M. Remote Sensing of the Asian Seas. Cham: Springer, 2019: 429−447.
    [5]
    Guo Qiaoying, Xu Xiazhen, Zhang Kangyu, et al. Assessing global ocean wind energy resources using multiple satellite data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(1): 100.
    [6]
    Lang Shuyan, Lin Wenming, Zhang Yi, et al. On the quality control of HY-2 scatterometer high winds[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(21): 5565. doi: 10.3390/rs14215565
    [7]
    Liang Guozhou, Yang Jungang, Wang Jichao. Accuracy evaluation of CFOSAT SWIM L2 products based on NDBC buoy and Jason-3 altimeter data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(5): 887. doi: 10.3390/rs13050887
    [8]
    Fois F. Enhanced ocean scatterometry[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2015.
    [9]
    Fois F, Hoogeboom P, Le Chevalier F, et al. DOPSCAT: a mission concept for a Doppler wind-scatterometer[C]//2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Milan: IEEE, 2015: 2572−2575.
    [10]
    Fois F, Hoogeboom P, Le Chevalier F, et al. An analytical model for the description of the full-polarimetric sea surface Doppler signature[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2015, 120(2): 988−1015. doi: 10.1002/2014JC010589
    [11]
    Bao Qingliu, Dong Xiaolong, Zhu Di. Ocean surface current measurement using pencil-beam rotating scatterometer[C]//2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Quebec City: IEEE, 2014: 684−687.
    [12]
    Bao Qingliu, Lin Mingsen, Zhang Youguang, et al. The ocean surface current inversion mehtod of Doppler scatterometer[C]//2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Fort Worth, TX: IEEE, 2017: 1962−1965.
    [13]
    Rodríguez E, Wineteer A, Perkovic-Martin D, et al. Estimating ocean vector winds and currents using a Ka-band pencil-beam Doppler scatterometer[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(4): 576. doi: 10.3390/rs10040576
    [14]
    Spencer M W, Wu C, Long D G. Improved resolution backscatter measurements with the SeaWinds pencil-beam scatterometer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(1): 89−104. doi: 10.1109/36.823904
    [15]
    Miao Yuanjing, Dong Xiaolong, Bao Qingliu, et al. Perspective of a Ku-Ka dual-frequency scatterometer for simultaneous wide-swath ocean surface wind and current measurement[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(7): 1042. doi: 10.3390/rs10071042
    [16]
    Zhang Jingyu, Dong Xiaolong, Zhu Di, et al. Airborne validation experiments for spaceborne Doppler scatterometers and the joint observation of wind and currents[C]//2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Brussels: IEEE, 2021: 3209−3212.
    [17]
    Chelton D B, Schlax M G, Samelson R M, et al. Prospects for future satellite estimation of small-scale variability of ocean surface velocity and vorticity[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2019, 173: 256−350. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2018.10.012
    [18]
    Ardhuin F, Brandt P, Gaultier L, et al. SKIM, a candidate satellite mission exploring global ocean currents and waves[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019, 6: 209. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00209
    [19]
    Du Yan, Dong Xiaolong, Jiang Xingwei, et al. Ocean surface current multiscale observation mission (OSCOM): simultaneous measurement of ocean surface current, vector wind, and temperature[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2021, 193: 102531. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102531
    [20]
    杜岩, 董晓龙, 蒋兴伟, 等. 全球海表流场多尺度结构观测卫星计划[J]. 空间科学学报, 2022, 42(5): 849−861. doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.05.2022-0047

    Du Yan, Dong Xiaolong, Jiang Xingwei, et al. Ocean surface current multiscale observation mission[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2022, 42(5): 849−861. doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.05.2022-0047
    [21]
    Lin Wenming, Dong Xiaolong, Portabella M, et al. A perspective on the performance of the CFOSAT rotating fan-beam scatterometer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(2): 627−639. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2858852
    [22]
    Yurovsky Y Y, Kudryavtsev V N, Grodsky S A, et al. Ka-band dual copolarized empirical model for the sea surface radar cross section[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(3): 1629−1647. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2628640
    [23]
    Rodriguez E, Perkovic-Martin D, Baldi C, et al. Ka-band doppler scatterometer for measurements of ocean surface vector winds and currents[C]//Proceedings of Earth Science Technology Forum ESTF, Leesburg,Virginia: [s.n.], 2014.
    [24]
    Romeiser R, Thompson D R. Numerical study on the along-track interferometric radar imaging mechanism of oceanic surface currents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(1): 446−458. doi: 10.1109/36.823940
    [25]
    Freilich M H. SeaWinds: algorithm theoretical basis document[R]. Washington: NASA, 2000.
    [26]
    Bao Qingliu, Lin Mingsen, Zhang Youguang, et al. Ocean surface current inversion method for a Doppler scatterometer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(11): 6505−6516. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2728824
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(4)

    Article views (192) PDF downloads(31) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return