基于GF-1 WFV影像的黄河口湿地植被盖度估测及分析

王建步; 张杰; 马毅; 任广波

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.06.004

基于GF-1 WFV影像的黄河口湿地植被盖度估测及分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.06.004

国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东青岛 266061

基金项目: 海洋公益性行业科研专项经费项目（201205008-01）；高分海岸带遥感监测与应用示范项目。

计量
- 文章访问数: 538
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 492
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-09-15
- 修回日期: 2017-10-16

Vegetation fraction coverage estimation and analysis of the Yellow River Estuary wetland based on GF-1 WFV satellite image

The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

摘要

摘要: 植被盖度是植被生长状况的重要定量指标，而目前开展的植被盖度遥感估测工作主要集中在陆地区域，对河口湿地植被盖度遥感估测工作比较少见。本文基于国产GF-1 WFV遥感影像开展了黄河口湿地植被盖度估算，并结合植被类型、土壤盐度和植被指数分布状况开展了植被盖度分布特征分析，得到如下结论：（1）基于GF-1 WFV卫星影像的NDVI、SRI、SAVI、MSAVI和DVI 5种植被指数，分别建立植被盖度估测模型，其中基于NDVI、SRI、MSAVI和DVI 4种植被指数建立的多变量线性回归模型估测精度最好，其决定系数（R²）最大，为0.904，均方根误差RMSE最小，为0.14；（2）植被盖度估算模型的精度与植被盖度本身有一定的关系，其中各植被盖度回归模型中，盖度大于0.8时估算精度要优于盖度小于0.6的区域，RMSE最大相差0.04；（3）以潮滩碱蓬和潮滩芦苇为主的植被覆盖区属于低植被盖度区，盖度位于0.03~0.5，盐度在1.5 g/L左右；芦苇草甸、互花米草和柽柳灌丛植被覆盖区属于高植被盖度区，盖度位于0.8~1.0，其中芦苇草甸土壤盐度小于1.2 g/L，柽柳灌丛土壤盐度在1.4~2.0 g/L，在高盖度植被区混生有中等盖度的植被，盖度在0.5~0.8，土壤盐度在1.8 g/L左右。
- GF-1WFV影像 /
- 黄河口湿地 /
- 植被盖度 /
- 植被指数
Abstract: Vegetation fraction coverage (VFC) is an important quantitative indicator of the vegetation growth. At present, remote sensing estimation work of VFC has been mainly implemented in land areas but seldom in estuary wetland. In this paper, we carried out VFC estimation of the Yellow River Estuary wetland based on homemade GF-1 WFV satellite image, and developed the analysis of VFC distribution characteristics based on vegetation type, soil salinity and vegetation index. The main conclusions we drew from this study are:(1) According to GF-1 WFV satellite image, VFC estimation model was built based on five vegetation index, including NDVI, SRI, SAVI, MSAVI and DVI. The largest determination coefficient R² (0.904) and the smallest root-mean-square error RMSE (0.14) were obtained from the multivariate linear regression model, which was the best model of all, built upon NDVI, SRI, MSAVI and DVI. (2) Estimation precision of VFC estimation model was found depending on the value of VFC. The estimation precision was higher in areas with a VFC value larger than 0.8, compared to areas with a VFC value smaller than 0.6 and the maximum difference for RMSE is 0.04. (3) VFC areas that mainly occupied with suaeda and tidal flat phragmites were considered to be low VFC areas, which had VFC values in the range of 0.03 to 0.5, and salt salinities were around 1.5 g/L. Phragmites meadow, spartina and tamarix chinesis shrub occupied areas belonged to high VFC areas with VFC values varied from 0.8 to 1.0. The salt salinity of phragmites meadow was smaller than 1.2 g/L, and that of tamarix chinesis shrub was in between 1.4 and 2.0 g/L. Medium VFC vegetation with VFC values ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 was found in high VFC areas and possessed salt salinity around 1.8 g/L. (4) Among all studied areas, low and high VFC areas accounted for 25.1% and 20.2%, respectively, while medium VFC areas only took up 8.3% in proportion.
- GF-1 WFV satellite image /
- Yellow River Estuary wetland /
- vegetation fraction coverage /
- vegetation index

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

Padma G V, Babu C T, Hema Malini B. Geoinformatics for coastal wetland inventory of Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh[J]. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 2014, 3(9):201-207.

Baret F, Hagolle O, Geiger B, et al. LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION:Part 1:principles of the algorithm[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110(3):275-286.

任广波, 张杰, 马毅. 基于HJ-1A高光谱的黄河口碱蓬和柽柳盖度反演模型研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2015, 37(9):51-58. Ren Guangbo, Zhang Jie, Ma Yi. Suaeda-salsa and tamarisk fractional cover inversion models by HJ-1A hyperspectral remote sensing image in Yellow River Estuary[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2015, 37(9):51-58.

Jia Kun, Liang Shunlin, Liu Suhong, et al. Global land surface fractional vegetation cover estimation using general regression neural networks from MODIS surface reflectance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9):4787-4796.

Zhang Xianfeng, Liao Chunhua, Li J, et al. Fractional vegetation cover estimation in arid and semi-arid environments using HJ-1 satellite hyperspectral data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 21:506-512.

Wang G, Han L, Zhang Y, et al. Spatial-temporal variation of NDVI surface Northeast[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(6):87-91.

Boyd D S, Foody G M, Ripple W J. Evaluation of approaches for forest cover estimation in the Pacific Northwest, USA, using remote sensing[J]. Applied Geography, 2002, 22(4):375-392.

Gutman G, Ignatov A. The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, 19(8):1533-1543.

Choudhury B J, Ahmed N U, Idso S B, et al. Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 50(1):1-17.

Gitelson A A, Kaufman Y J, Stark R, et al. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80(1):76-87.

Ahmad S, Kalra A, Stephen H. Estimating soil moisture using remote sensing data:a machine learning approach[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2010, 33(1):69-80.

程红芳, 章文波, 陈锋. 植被覆盖度遥感估算方法研究进展[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2008, 20(1):13-18. Cheng Hongfang, Zhang Wenbo, Chen Feng. Advances in researches on application of remote sensing method to estimating vegetation coverage[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2008, 20(1):13-18.

Li Ying, Wang Hong, Li Xiaobing. Fractional vegetation cover estimation based on an improved selective endmember spectral mixture model[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0124608.

Yang Shaowen, Dong Bin, Liu Liping, et al. Research on vegetation coverage change in Sheng Jin Lake wetland of Anhui Province[J]. Wetlands, 2015, 35(4):677-682.

Alabed M, Shi Zhou, Yaghi A, et al. Application of GIS and remote sensing in soil degradation assessments in the Syrian coast[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 2002, 26(2):191-196.

杨胜天, 刘昌明, 杨志峰, 等. 南水北调西线调水工程区的自然生态环境评价[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1):11-18. Yang Shengtian, Liu Changming, Yang Zhifeng, et al. Natural eco-environmental evaluation of west route area of Interbasin Water Transfer Project[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(1):11-18.

Xiao Jingfeng, Moody A. A comparison of methods for estimating fractional green vegetation cover within a desert-to-upland transition zone in central New Mexico, USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 98(2/3):237-250.

Gu Zhujun, Zeng Zhiyuan, Shi Xuezheng, et al. Estimating models of vegetation fractional coverage based on remote sensing images at different radiometric correction levels[J]. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 2009, 4(4):402-408

刘同海, 吴新宏, 董永平. 基于TM影像的草原沙漠化植被盖度分析研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2010, 24(2):141-144. Liu Tonghai, Wu Xinhong, Dong Yongping. Analysis on vegetation coverage of grassland desertification based on TM image[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010, 24(2):141-144.

Kim J Y, Im R Y, Do Y, et al. Above-ground biomass estimation of tuberous bulrush (Bolboschoenus planiculmis) in mudflats using remotely sensed multispectral image[J]. Ocean Science Journal, 2016, 51(1):151-158.

Rouse J W Jr, Haas R H, Schell J A, et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS[R]. College Station, TX, United States:NASA, 1974.

Jordan C F. Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor[J]. Ecology, 1969, 50(4):663-666.

Huete A R. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988, 25(3):295-309.

Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete A R, et al. A modified soil adjusted vegetation index[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 48(2):119-126.

李旭文, 季耿善, 杨静. 太湖梅梁湖湾蓝藻生物量遥感估算[J]. 国土资源遥感, 1995, 7(2):23-28. Li Xuwen, Ji Gengshan, Yang Jing. Estimating cyanophyta biomass standing crops in Meiliang Gulf of Lake Taihu by satellite remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 1995, 7(2):23-28.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计