北极冰海耦合模式对两种不同大气再分析资料响应的分析

牟龙江; 赵进平

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.11.008

北极冰海耦合模式对两种不同大气再分析资料响应的分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.11.008

中国海洋大学物理海洋教育部重点实验室, 山东青岛 266100

基金项目: 国家重大科学研究计划项目(2015CB953903);国家自然科学委员会重点基金项目(41330960)。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1359
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 1262
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-16

Analysis on the response of an Arctic ice-ocean coupled model to two different atmospheric reanalysis datasets

Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

摘要

摘要: 本文中我们比较了Climate Forecast System Reanalysis(CFSR)高分辨率的再分析数据集和低分辨率的Japanese 25-year Reanalysis Project(JRA25)再分析数据集在向下短波辐射、向下长波辐射、10 m风场、近地面气温、降水、湿度上的不同,发现二者差异最大的为降水数据,其次为向下短波辐射数据、向下长波辐射数据。用这两个数据集驱动同一冰海耦合模式,CFSR强迫的海冰、北冰洋中层水和加拿大海盆温盐结构与实测相比有很大差距,等密度面上的地转流速在加拿大海盆和欧亚海盆比JRA25强迫的结果高20%,同时等密度面的深度偏深、位温偏高,在弗拉姆海峡的流通量也比海洋再分析数据Simple Ocean Data Assimilation(SODA)偏多。CFSR的向下辐射数据更加接近实测,采用此数据的敏感性实验模拟结果与实测符合的更好。对于海冰的模拟,云量起着至关重要的作用,降水带来的淡水通量通过影响大西洋入流水携带的热量进而影响到冰区。此外,CFSR过量的降水也是二者对于北冰洋温盐结构、弗拉姆海峡流通量以及地转流强度模拟产生偏差的主要原因。尽管风场的分辨率不同,在海盆尺度上对于海冰和海水温盐结构的影响并不大。
- 北冰洋 /
- CFSR /
- JRA25 /
- 冰海耦合模式 /
- 加拿大海盆 /
- 弗拉姆海峡
Abstract: The downward radiative fluxes, wind speed, near surface temperature, precipitation, humidity got from Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and the Japanese 25-year Reanalysis Project (JRA25) are compared in this article. We find that most significant biases between the two datasets are precipitation, downward fluxes for both shortwave and longwave radiation. Driving by these two datasets, model results forced by CFSR shows big differences on sea ice, Atlantic water and thermohaline structure in Canada basin compared to in situ observations, with the simulated geostrophic current on isopycnal surface 20% higher than that forced by JRA25 and a larger volume fluxes than that derived from SODA data. Sensitivity experiment forced by downward radiative fluxes from CFSR, which have been evaluated to be close to observed values, demonstrates comparable results to observational results. The cloud data plays a key role in modeling sea ice while freshwater flux brought by precipitation can change the heat transport of Atlantic inflow prominently and carry a further effect on sea ice in the Arctic. The overestimated precipitation in CFSR is the major for large biases of volume flux through Fram Strait, geostropic current on isopycnal surface and thermohaline structure in central Arctic. Although reanalysis wind have different resolution for the two datasets, our results indicates that it carries an ignorable effect on modeling sea ice and thermohaline structure on basin scale.
- Arctic Ocean /
- CFSR /
- JRA25 /
- ice ocean coupled model /
- Canada Basin /
- Fram strait

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

Dickson B. Oceanography: All change in the Arctic[J]. Nature, 1999, 397(6718): 389-391.

Serreze M C, Holland M M, Stroeve J. Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5818): 1533-1536.

Parkinson C L, Cavalieri D J, Gloersen P, et al. Arctic sea ice extents, areas, and trends, 1978—1996[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans(1978—2012), 1999, 104(C9): 20837-20856.

Screen J A, Simmonds I. The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7293): 1334-1337.

Serreze M C, Francis J A. The Arctic amplification debate[J]. Climatic Change, 2006, 76(3/4): 241-264.

Holland M M, Bitz C M. Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2003, 21(3/4): 221-232.

Pithan F, Mauritsen T. Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2014, 7:181-184.

Rudels B, Friedrich H J, Quadfasel D. The Arctic circumpolar boundary current[J]. Deep-Sea Research Part Ⅱ: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 1999, 46(6): 1023-1062.

Yang J. The Arctic and Subarctic Ocean flux of potential vorticity and the Arctic Ocean circulation[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2005, 35(12): 2387-2407.

Karcher M, Kauker F, Gerdes R, et al. On the dynamics of Atlantic Water circulation in the Arctic Ocean[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2007, 112(C4).

Polyakov I V, Alekseev G V, Timokhov L A, et al. Variability of the intermediate Atlantic water of the Arctic Ocean over the last 100 years[J]. Journal of Climate, 2004, 17(23): 4485-4497.

Zhang J, Hibler III W D, Steele M, et al. Arctic ice-ocean modeling with and without climate restoring[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1998, 28(2): 191-217.

Aksenov Y, Bacon S, Coward A C, et al. Polar outflow from the Arctic Ocean: A high resolution model study[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2010, 83(1): 14-37.

Haynes P H, McIntyre M E. On the evolution of vorticity and potential vorticity in the presence of diabatic heating and frictional or other forces[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1987, 44(5): 828-841.

Nguyen A T, Menemenlis D, Kwok R. Arctic ice-ocean simulation with optimized model parameters: Approach and assessment[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2011, 116(C4).

Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, et al. The JRA-25 reanalysis[J]. 気象集誌. 第2輯, 2007, 85(3): 369-432.

Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan H L, et al. The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2010, 91(8): 1015-1057.

Iziomon M G, Mayer H, Matzarakis A. Downward atmospheric longwave irradiance under clear and cloudy skies: Measurement and parameterization[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2003, 65(10): 1107-1116.

Spall M A. On the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2013, 43(11): 2352-2371.

Zhao J, Cao Y, Shi J. Core region of Arctic Oscillation and the main atmospheric events impact on the Arctic[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(22): L22708.

Large W G, Pond S. Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1982, 12(5): 464-482.

Marshall D. Subduction of water masses in an eddying ocean[J]. Journal of Marine Research, 1997, 55(2): 201-222.

Condron A, Renfrew I A. The impact of polar mesoscale storms on northeast Atlantic Ocean circulation[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2013, 6(1): 34-37.

Lindsay R, Wensnahan M, Schweiger A, et al. Evaluation of seven different atmospheric reanalysis products in the Arctic[J]. Journal of Climate, 2014, 27(7): 2588-2606.

Zhang J, Lindsay R, Steele M, et al. What drove the dramatic retreat of arctic sea ice during summer 2007?[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35(11):L11505.

Hunke E C, Holland M M. Global atmospheric forcing data for Arctic ice-ocean modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2007, 112(C4):C04S14.

Nurser A J G, Bacon S. The Rossby radius in the Arctic Ocean[J]. Ocean Science, 2014, 10(6): 967-975.

Lique C, Steele M. Where can we find a seasonal cycle of the Atlantic water temperature within the Arctic Basin?[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2012, 117(C3):C03026.

Li X, Su J, Zhao J. An evaluation of the simulations of the Arctic Intermediate Water in climate models and reanalyses[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2014, 33(12): 1-14.

McDougall T J, Klocker A. An approximate geostrophic streamfunction for use in density surfaces[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2010, 32(3): 105-117.

Aksenov Y, Ivanov V V, Nurser A J, et al. The Arctic circumpolar boundary current[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2011, 116(C9):C09017.

Marshall J, Jamous D, Nilsson J. Entry, flux, and exit of potential vorticity in ocean circulation[J]. Journal of physical oceanography, 2001, 31(3): 777-789.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计