The effect of vertical resolution on the simulation of M2 tide in Changjiang Estuary
-
摘要: 基于EFDC(Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code)模式建立了长江口及其邻近海域的三维水动力学模型, 研究模型的垂直分辨率对该海域M2分潮模拟的影响。结果表明:垂直分辨率的变化对M2分潮传播方向的模拟结果影响较小, 但其可通过底摩擦和湍流耗散两个计算过程来影响潮能通量的模拟结果, 最终对长江口和杭州湾内的M2分潮振幅产生显著的影响。最底层厚度较大时, 上层自由水体的高流速特征在最底层过于明显, 进而导致计算的底摩擦应力偏高, 此时提高底层的垂直分辨率会降低底摩擦对能量的耗散。另一方面, 垂直湍流混合作用会随垂直分辨率的增加而增强, 所以垂直分辨率增加到一定程度后, 上层自由水体的高流速会经由增强的湍流混合而更多的传入底层, 使计算的底摩擦应力随垂直分辨率的提高而有重新增加的趋势, 进而又增强底摩擦对潮能的耗散。Abstract: A three-dimensional hydrodynamic model for Changjiang Estuary and the adjacent sea was developed within the framework of Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC). The effect of vertical resolution on the simulation of M2 tide was analyzed. The direction of M2 tide propagation was simulated correctly. The M2 tide propagated from southeast to northwest in open sea, then it propagated inland along coastline in Changjiang River and Hangzhou Bay. The bottom stress and turbulence varying with vertical resolution determined the energy propagated into Changjiang River and Hangzhou Bay. This made the amplitude of M2 tide decrease with increasing vertical resolution in Changjiang River. But in Hangzhou Bay, the amplitude of M2 tide increased with increasing vertical resolution at first, then decreased with increasing vertical resolution. The computation of bottom stress was based on the mixing length theory and the boundary layer was assumed to be a constant fluxes layer. The bottom layer should be thin enough so that the higher velocity of the upper water, which resulted in higher bottom stress, was of little importance in bottom layer. The intensity of vertical turbulence increased with increasing vertical resolution. This transmitted more high velocity of upper water into bottom layer and resulted in higher bottom stress again. Finally, the more consumption of energy caused by higher bottom stress made the amplitude of M2 tide become smaller.
-
Key words:
- M2 tide /
- vertical resolution /
- bottom stress /
- EFDC /
- Changjiang Estuary
-
Xu H Z, Lin J, Shen J, et al. Wind impact on pollutant transport in a shallow estuary[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2008, 27(3): 147-160. 罗琳, 李适宇, 王东晓. 珠江河口夏季缺氧现象的模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(5): 729-735. Guan W B, Wong L A, Xu D F. Modelling nitrogen and phosphorus cycles and dissolved oxygen in the Zhujiang EstuaryⅠ.Model development[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2001, 20(4): 493-504. Guan W B, Wong L A, Xu D F. Modelling nitrogen and phosphorus cycles and dissolved oxygen in the Zhujiang Estuary:Ⅱ.Model results[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2001, 20(4): 505-514. 蔡怡, 宋学家, 于卫东. 海洋模式中Boussinesq近似误差讨论[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2005, 23(2): 121-126. 白学志, 王凡. 夏季长江冲淡水转向机制的数值试验[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2003, 34(6): 593-603. Hamrick J. A three-dimensional environmental fluid dynamics computer code: Theoretical and computational aspects[R]. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 1992. Jiang H Z, Shen Y M, Wang S D. Numerical study on salinity stratification in the Oujiang River Estuary[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(6): 835-842. 徐洪周, 林晶, 王东晓. 基于一个年龄概念的河口污染物输运数值模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(1): 92-98. 陈景秋, 赵万星, 季振刚. 重庆两江汇流水动力模型[J]. 水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2005, 20(S1): 829-835. 姜恒志, 沈永明, 汪守东. 瓯江口三维潮流和盐度数值模拟研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2009, 24(1): 63-70. 王翠, 孙英兰, 张学庆. 基于EFDC模型的胶州湾三维潮流数值模拟[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 164(5): 833-840. 王建平, 苏保林, 贾海峰. 密云水库及其流域营养物集成模拟的模型体系研究[J]. 环境科学, 2006, 27(7): 1286-1291. Kong Q R, Jiang C B, Qin J J, et al. Sediment transportation and bed morphology reshaping in Yellow River Delta[J]. Science in China(Series E:Technological Sciences), 2009, 52(11): 3382-3390. 陈异晖. 基于EFDC模型的滇池水质模拟[J]. 云南环境科学, 2005, 24(4): 28-30, 46. 齐珺, 杨志峰, 熊明, 等. 长江水系武汉段水动力过程三维数值模拟[J]. 水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2008, 23(2): 212-219. 郑晓琴, 丁平兴, 胡克林. 长江口及邻近海域夏季温盐分布特征数值分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 142(6): 14-23. 谢锐, 吴德安, 严以新, 等. EFDC模型在长江口及相邻海域三维水流模拟中的开发应用[J]. 水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2010, 25(2): 165-174. 严以新, 张素香, 李熙. 长江口南港化学需氧量动力学模型的应用[J]. 水道港口, 2007, 113(4): 278-281. Li X, Wang Y G, Zhang S X. Numerical simulation of water quality in Yangtze Estuary[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2009, 2(4): 40-51. Li J P, Zeng Q C, Chou J F. Computational uncertainty principle in Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations:Ⅰ. Numerical Results\[J\]. Science in China (Series E), 2000,43(05): 403-412. Li J P, Zeng Q C, Chou J F. Computational uncertainty principle in Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations:Ⅱ. Theoretical analysis[J]. Science in China (Series E), 2012,59: 147-149. Wang P F, Li J P, Li Q. Computational uncertainty and the application of a high-performance multiple precision scheme to obtaining the correct reference solution of Lorenz equations[J]. Numerical Algorithms, 2001,44(01): 55-74. Mellor G L, Yamada T. Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 1982, 20(4): 851-875. 海洋图集编委会. 渤海黄海东海海洋图集(水文)[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 1992: 13-168. Matsumoto K, Takanezawa T, Ooe M. Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data into hydrodynamical model: A global model and a regional model around Japan[J]. Journal of Oceanography, 2000, 56(5): 567-581. Fang G. H, Wang Y G, Wei Z X, et al. Empirical cotidal charts of the Bohai, Yellow, and East China Seas from 10 years of TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2004, 109(C11): C11006. 翟世奎, 孟伟, 于志刚, 等. 三峡工程一期蓄水后的长江口海域环境[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2008: 66-67. Greenberg D A. A numerical model investigation of tidal phenomena in the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine[J]. Marine Geodesy, 1979, 2(2): 161-187. Mellor G L. Oscillatory bottom boundary layers[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2002, 32(11): 3075-3088.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1304
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 1066
- 被引次数: 0