江苏近海地层原位剪切波速相关特性及预测方法研究

狄圣杰; 汪明元; 张昆; 杜文博; 徐学勇

doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.0253-4193.2014.03.014

江苏近海地层原位剪切波速相关特性及预测方法研究

doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.0253-4193.2014.03.014

1.
中国水电顾问集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司, 浙江杭州 310014;浙江大学滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心, 浙江杭州 310058
2.
中国水电顾问集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司, 浙江杭州 310014
3.
浙江华东建设工程有限公司, 浙江杭州 310028

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（41101519）；浙江省博士后科研项目二类择优资助（BSH1302013）；中国水电顾问集团重大科技项目资助（GW-KJ-2011-18）；华东勘测设计研究院科技项目（KY2013-02-09）。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1252
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 1142
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-06-14
- 修回日期: 2013-08-05

Study on related features and prediction method of in-situ shear wave velocity of offshore stratum in Jiangsu Province

1.
HydroChina Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou 310014, China;Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.
HydroChina Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou 310014, China
3.
Zhejiang East China Construction Project Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310028, China

摘要

摘要: 剪切波速测试是原位勘测常用且有效的技术之一，其测试成果可用于分析场地土层动力学特性。海洋地层测试条件恶劣，在某些情况下对剪切波速的预测分析尤为重要。为了研究海洋地层精确的剪切波速预测方法，结合江苏近海及潮间带的剪切波速原位测试成果，总结和对比分析了剪切波速预测方法，评判了剪切波速的变化特性和与土体物理力学指标的统计关系。基于广义回归神经网络（GRNN）方法，通过剪切波速与土体各参数的统计关系，建立了剪切波速与土体各物理力学指标的非线性映射关系，进行了剪切波速的预测分析，得到了较好的预测结果。
- 海洋地层 /
- 剪切波速 /
- 相关特性 /
- GRNN /
- 预测分析
Abstract: Shear wave in-situ testing is one of the techniques that are commonly useful and effective. The test results can be used for the analysis of soil dynamics. The testing conditions of marine stratum are bad, and in some cases for shear wave velocity prediction is particularly important. In order to study on precise prediction method of shear wave velocity of marine stratum, according to the Jiangsu offshore and intertidal shear wave velocity testing results, the shear wave velocity prediction methods are summarized and evaluated. The statistical relationships between shear wave velocity characteristics and physical-mechanical index of soil are analyzed. Based on the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) method, according to the statistical relationship, the nonlinear mapping relationship between physical-mechanical indexes of the soil and shear wave velocity tested is established. The prediction of shear wave velocity is analyzed and studied. It shows that the good prediction results can be obtained through the method.
- marine stratum /
- shear wave velocity /
- related features /
- GRNN /
- prediction analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

Ohta Y, Goto N. Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1978, 6(2): 167-187.

Mayne P W, Rix G J. Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(2): 193-194.

Hardin B O, Drnevich V P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, 1972, 98(7): 667-692.

Paoletti L, Hegazy Y, Monaco S, et al. Prediction of shear wave velocity for offshore sands using CPT data-Adriatic sea[C]//2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, 2010:1-8.

Mandar P K, Anjan P, Singh D N. Application of shear wave velocity for characterizing clays from coastal regions[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 14(3):307-321.

张宇辉, 张献民, 程国勇. 土石混合介质中石料间隙土压实度剪切波速评价研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(6): 909-915.

刘红帅, 郑桐, 齐文浩, 等.常规土类剪切波速与埋深的关系分析[J].岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(7): 1142.

潘国富, 叶银灿, 来向华, 等. 海底沉积物实验室剪切波速度及其与沉积物的物理性质之间的关系[J]. 海洋学报, 2006, 5(28): 64-68.

中华人民共和国建设部.GB50191-93:构筑物抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社, 1995.

战吉艳, 陈国兴, 刘建达.苏州城区深软场地土剪切波速与土层深度的经验关系[J].世界地震工程, 2009, 25(2): 11-17.

汪闻韶.土工地震减灾工程中的一个重要参量—剪切波速[J].水利学报, 1994(3): 80-84.

Tabari K, Tabari O, Tabari M. A fast method for estimating shear wave velocity by using neural network[J]. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2011, 5(11): 1429-1434.

Hasancebi N, Ulusay R. Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2007, 66: 203-213.

Seed H B, Idriss I M, Arango I. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data[J]. Journal Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 109(3): 458-482.

Sykora D W, Koester J P. Correlation between dynamic shear resistance and standard penetration resistance in soils[M][C]//Von Thun J L, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Ⅱ: Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation.Geotechnical Special Publication, 1988.

Specht D F. A general regression neural network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Network, 1991, 2: 568-576.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计