浙南近岸海流季节变化特征

李鹏; 杨世伦; 陈沈良

doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.0253-4193.2014.03.003

浙南近岸海流季节变化特征

doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.0253-4193.2014.03.003

1.
国家海洋局东海预报中心, 上海 200081
2.
华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室, 上海 200062

基金项目: 我国近海海洋综合调查与评价（908-01-ST05）；上海市科委重大项目子课题（10dz1210505）；河口海岸学国家重点实验室自助项目（SKLEC-2012KYYW06）；国家海洋局东海青年科学基金（201210）。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1399
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 1414
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-03-08
- 修回日期: 2013-08-02

Primary analysis of current condition and seasonal variation in southern Zhejiang

1.
Forecast Centers for East China Sea, State Oceanic Administration of China, Shanghai 200081, China
2.
State Key Lab of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

摘要

摘要: 为了揭示浙南海流特征及其季节和垂向变化规律，于2006—2007年在浙南岸外一固定点（平均水深约32 m）利用ADP潜标进行了春、夏、秋、冬季4次多个潮周期分层海流流速流向观测。结果表明：（1）测点最大流速为148.9 cm/s，相应流向为75°，出现在春季表层大潮落潮阶段；垂向平均最大流速为106.2 cm/s，平均流向为81°，出现在夏季大潮落潮落急阶段。（2）剖面各层流速垂向差异明显，表层流速（28 m层以上）受海况影响明显，秋季平均流速最大（65.4 cm/s），冬季最小（42.8 cm/s），20~28 m层冬季最强，春季最弱，20 m层以下夏季最强，秋季最弱（仅小潮）；垂线平均流速夏季最强（46.5 cm/s），春季最小（33.7 cm/s）。（3）夏季海流基本上为（偏）北向流；秋、冬则基本上为（偏）南向流；春季具往复流特点，但以北向流为主。（4）垂向上夏季和春季流向较一致，冬季和秋季流向分异明显（20 m和10 m层）。（5）垂线平均余流为12.8~29.8 cm/s，夏季最强春季最弱；夏季和春季各层余流均为东北向，冬季为西南向，而秋季11 m层（包括11 m层）以下为E-NEE向，11 m层以上为西南向。结论：测点海流受到潮汐、季风和台湾暖流的共同制约。季风的影响夏、冬两季大于春、秋两季；季风的影响自表层向底层减弱（主要限于表层以下10 m）。
- 海流 /
- 季节变化 /
- 季风 /
- 浙南海域
Abstract: To research the current character,seasonal variation and pattern in vertical profile,vertical current speed and direction were observed using ADP,in summer,winter,spring and autumn from 2006 to 2007,in a fixed site of east China Sea southern Zhejiang Province. The results show: (1) The biggest speed was 148.9 cm/s,with the direction 75°,occurred in spring ebb peak in spring during the four observation periods. The biggest average speed in vertical reached 106.2 cm/s,occurred in spring ebb peak in summer. (2) Significant difference presented in vertical speed profile. In the surface (above 28 m),the current was interfered evidently by sea conditions with the biggest and least average speed in autumn and in winter,respectively; between 20m and 28 m layers,the current was strongest in winter and least in spring season; while below 20 m layer,the current was strongest in summer. The average speed in vertical profile was strongest in summer and least in spring,with the speed of 46.5 cm/s and 33.7 cm/s,respectively. (3) The current direction varied from season to season. In summer the direction was north,while in autumn and winter was south on the whole. However,in spring the current was periodic alternating,and the north current was dominated. (4) In vertical profile the current direction was consistent in every layer,while in winter and autumn the current direction varied clearly from bottom to surface. (5) In vertical profile the average residual flow speed was 12.8~29.8 cm/s in the four seasons and the residual flow was strongest in summer and least in spring. The direction of residual flow in summer and spring was northeast in every layer,in winter the direction was southwest. However in autumn the flow direction was complicated relatively,11 m above the seabed was east to north-east-east and below 11m layer the direction was southwest. Conclusion: In the study area,the current was controlled by tide,monsoon and Taiwan warm current together. The monsoon influence to the current in summer and winter was stronger than in spring and autumn,meanwhile the influence became weaker from surface to bottom.
- current /
- season variation /
- monsoon /
- East China Sea

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

陈吉余, 王宝灿, 虞志英.中国海岸发育过程和演变规律[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1989:393—402.

苏纪兰. 中国近海的环流动力机制研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2001, 23(3): 1—16.

沈焕庭, 茅志昌, 朱建荣.长江河口盐水入侵[M].北京: 海洋出版社, 2003:15—30.

Milliman J D, Shen H T, Yang Z S, et al. Transport and deposition of river sediment in the Changjiang Estuary and adjacent continental shelf[J].Continental Shelf Research, 1985, 4: 37—45.

Yang S L, Belkin I M, Belkina A I, et al. Delta response to decline in sediment supply from the Yangtze River: Evidence of the recent four decades and expectations for the next half-century[J].Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science, 2003, 57: 689—699.

唐军, 沈永明, 邱大洪.近岸沿岸流及污染物运动的数值模拟[J].海洋学报, 2008, 30(1):148—155.

曹沛奎, 严肃庄, 董永发, 等.浙闽淤泥质港湾的基本特征[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 2:76—82.

恽才兴.长江河口近期演变基本规律[M].北京: 海洋出版社, 2004:250—274.

Lie Heung Jae, Cho C, Lee J. Separation of the Kuroshio water and its penetration onto the continental shelf west of Kyushu[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103 (C2): 2963—2976.

林葵, 汤毓祥, 郭炳火.黄海、东海、上层实测流分析[J].海洋学报, 2002, 24(2):9—19.

方国洪, 杨景飞.东海东部和南部潮流的数值计算[J].海洋学报, 1987, 9(4):403—412.

王钟桾.对马暖流生成机制的数值模拟[J].黄渤海海洋, 1990, 8(4):12—19.

朱建荣, 丁平兴, 朱首贤.黄海、东海夏季环流的数值模拟[J].海洋学报, 2002, 24(1):124—133.

白学志, 王凡, 胡敦欣.东中国海环流及其季节变化的数值模拟[J].海洋科学集刊, 2003, 45:77—85

恽才兴, 蔡孟裔, 王宝全.利用卫星象片分析长江入海悬浮泥沙扩散问题[J].海洋与湖沼, 1981, 12(5):391—401.

张彩云, 商少凌, 陈德文, 商少平.冬季浙闽沿岸水分布的短期变动与风的关系初探[J].遥感学报, 2005, 9(4):452—458.

刘苍字, 邱佩英, 王效京.浙南近岸带沉积物的地球化学特征[J].海洋通报, 1991, 10(5):27—36.

章渭林. 浙闽近海潮波传播类型分析[J].海洋通报, 1993, 12(1):19—24.

胡方西, 温州海区海洋水文基本特征[G]//全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查温州试点区报告文集.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1981.

苏纪兰, 潘玉球. 台湾以北陆架环流动力学初步研究[J].海洋学报, 1989, 11:1—14.

经志友, 齐义泉, 华祖林. 闽浙沿岸上升流及其季节变化的数值研究[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(4):464—470.