海洋生态重要性区域的内涵与识别方法研究——以黄河口为例

傅明珠; 张朝晖; 王宗灵; 姜美洁; 王炜

海洋生态重要性区域的内涵与识别方法研究——以黄河口为例

1.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东青岛 266061;海洋生态环境科学与工程国家海洋局重点实验室, 山东青岛 266061;青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋生态与环境科学功能实验室, 山东青岛 266071
2.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东青岛 266061

基金项目: 海洋公益性行业科研专项经费项目（黄河口及邻近海域生态系统管理关键技术研究与应用，201105005）；国家自然科学青年基金项目（黄海冷水团次表层叶绿素最大值层的形成机制及其对初级生产力贡献研究，41506185）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1139
- HTML全文浏览量: 43
- PDF下载量: 623
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-02-29

The concept and identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas——Case study in the Huanghe River Estuary

1.
First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China;Key Lab of Science and Engineering for Marine Ecological Environment, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China;Marine Ecology and Environmental Science Laboratory, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China
2.
First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

摘要

摘要: 海洋生态环境目前正在承受来自人类活动和气候变化的巨大压力；急需必要的管理工具或决策支持系统来应对这些压力所带来的生态环境问题。对海洋生境的分类识别是开展生物多样性保护的基础和前提；海洋生态重要区识别作为一种客观、科学和灵活的生境分类评估和选划方法；已被科学界和管理者广泛接受和认可。本文首先介绍了海洋生态重要区的概念内涵以及识别方法的研究进展；给出了海洋生态重要区的定义；之后以黄河口为例；初步建立了针对该区域的生态重要区识别标准和评价方法；对黄河口及邻近海区进行了生态重要性等级划分。本文是对生态重要区识别方法在我国近海的首次应用尝试；研究结果可为我国基于生态系统的海洋管理提供科学方法和工具；也可为其他区域的研究提供借鉴。
- 海洋生态重要区 /
- 内涵与识别方法 /
- 黄河口
Abstract: Marine environments are experiencing intense pressures from anthropogenic activities and climate change, management tools or decision support systems are needed to deal with these problems. The classification of marine habitats is the basis and critical to the protection of marine biodiversity and the sustainable usage of marine resources. The identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSAs) as a objective, scientific and flexible habitat classification and evaluation tool has been widely accepted by the scientists and managers. The present paper began with the introduction of the progress in the concept and identification method of the EBSAs. Then we developed a protocol and a suite of criteria and indicators to identify EBSAs. Finally, application of the methods to Huanghe River Estuary and its adjacent area is presented as a case study based on the integration of all available ecological information we collected. This study is the first trial of EBSAs identification in China coastal areas. The results of our study are expected to provide scientific methods and tools to the ecosystem-based management and provide references to its applications in other areas.
- marine ecologically and biologically significant areas /
- concept and identification method /
- Huanghe River Estuary

HTML全文

参考文献(28)

Halpern B S, Walbridge S, Selkoe K A, et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5865):948-952.

Constanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.

Gregr E J, Ahrens A L, Perry R I. Reconciling classifications of ecologically and biologically significant areas in the world's oceans[J]. Marine Policy, 2012, 36(3):716-726.

DFO. Identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas[R]. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Ecosystem Status Report 2004/006, 2004.

Dunn D C, Ardron J, Bax N, et al. The convention on biological diversity's ecologically or biologically significant areas:origins, development, and current status[J]. Marine Policy, 2014, 49:137-145.

Bax N J, Cleary J, Donnelly B, et al. Results of efforts by the convention on biological diversity to describe ecologically or biologically significant marine areas[J]. Conservation Biology, 2016, 30(3):571-581.

Ayers J, Blacow A, Enticknap B, et al. Important ecological areas in the ocean:a comprehensive ecosystem protection approach to the spatial management of marine resources[R]. Oceana Discussion Paper, 2010.

CBD. The conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity 9 decision IX/20, marine and coastal biodiversity[R/OL]. http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=11663,2008.

林金兰, 陈彬, 黄浩, 等. 海洋生物多样性保护优先区域的确定[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(1):38-46. Lin Jinlan, Chen Bin, Huang Hao, et al. Identification of the priority areas for marine biodiversity conservation[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 21(1):38-46.

Derous S, Agardy T, Hillewaert H, et al. A concept for biological valuation in the marine environment[J]. Oceanologia, 2007, 49(1):99-128.

Smith P G R, Theberge J B. A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas[J]. Environmental Management, 1986, 10(6):715-734.

Satsmadjis J. Comparison of indicators of pollution in the Mediterranean[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1985, 16(10):395-400.

Bricker S B, Ferreira J G, Simas T. An integrated methodology for assessment of estuarine trophic status[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 169(1):39-60.

Jeffrey D W, Wilson J G, Harris C R, et al. The application of two simple indices to Irish estuary pollution status[M]//Wilson J G, Halcrow W. Estuarine Management and Quality Assessment. New York:Plenum Press, 1985:147-161.

Borja A, Franco J, Pérez V. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2000, 40(12):1100-1114.

McGinty M, Leader H. An estuarine index of biotic integrity for Chesapeake Bay. Tidal fish communities[C]//Hartwell I. Proceedings of the workshop on biological habitat quality indicators for essential fish habitat. South Carolina:EUA, 1997:61-64.

Nelson W G. Prospects for development of an index of biotic integrity for evaluating habitat degradation in coastal systems[J]. Chemistry and Ecology, 1990, 4(4):197-210.

DFO. Identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSA) in the Canadian Arctic[R]. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Science Advisory Report 2011/055, 2011.

Dunstan P K, Bax N J, Dambacher J M, et al. Using ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) to implement marine spatial planning[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2016, 121:116-127.

Lavoie D, Starr M, Zakardjian B, et al. Identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSA) in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence:primary production[R]. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Research Document 2007/079, 2007.

Derous S. Marine biological valuation as a decision support tool for marine management[D]. Ghent:Ghent University, 2007.

Dunn D C, Ardron J, Ban N, et al. Ecologically or biologically significant areas in the pelagic realm:examples & guildelines-workshop report[R]. Gland, Switzerland:IUCN, 2011.

Clark M R, Rowden A A, Schlacher T A, et al. Identifying ecologically or biologically significant areas (EBSA):a systematic method and its application to seamounts in the South Pacific Ocean[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2014, 91:65-79.

冷宇, 刘一霆, 杜明, 等. 黄河口海域2004-2009年春季大型底栖动物群落的时空变化[J]. 海洋学报, 2013, 35(6):128-139. Leng Yu, Liu Yiting, Du Ming, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of macrofaunal communities in the Estuary of Yellow River during spring of 2004-2009[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2013, 35(6):128-139.

冷宇, 赵升, 刘霜, 等. 黄河口海域夏季浮游植物的分布特征[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2013, 34(6):41-46. Leng Yu, Zhao Sheng, Liu Shuang, et al. Distribution characteristics of phytoplankton in the Estuary of Yellow River during summer[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2013, 34(6):41-46.

廖巍, 张龙军, 陈洪涛, 等. 2001-2011年黄河口营养盐变化及入海通量估算[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2013, 43(1):81-86. Liao Wei, Zhang Longjun, Chen Hongtao, et al. Nutrients variations and fluxes estimation in the Yellow River Estuary from 2001 to 2011[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2013, 43(1):81-86.

国家海洋局. GB/T 12763.9, 海洋调查规范第9部分:海洋生态调查指南[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008. State Oceanic Administration. GB/T 12763.9, Specifications for oceanographic survey-Part 9:guidelines for marine ecological survey[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 2008.

Weaver P, Johnson D. Biodiversity:think big for marine conservation[J]. Nature, 2012, 483(7390):399.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

计量

文章访问数: 1139
HTML全文浏览量: 43
PDF下载量: 623
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板