留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种新型海-气湍流通量参数化方案的模式测试

班军梅 胡艳冰 李煜斌 徐小慧 孙燕

班军梅, 胡艳冰, 李煜斌, 徐小慧, 孙燕. 一种新型海-气湍流通量参数化方案的模式测试[J]. 海洋学报, 2010, 32(6): 72-82.
引用本文: 班军梅, 胡艳冰, 李煜斌, 徐小慧, 孙燕. 一种新型海-气湍流通量参数化方案的模式测试[J]. 海洋学报, 2010, 32(6): 72-82.
BAN Jun-mei, HU Yan-bing, LI Yu-bin, XU Xiao-hui, SUN Yan. Model test of a new air-sea turbulent flux parameterization scheme[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2010, 32(6): 72-82.
Citation: BAN Jun-mei, HU Yan-bing, LI Yu-bin, XU Xiao-hui, SUN Yan. Model test of a new air-sea turbulent flux parameterization scheme[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2010, 32(6): 72-82.

一种新型海-气湍流通量参数化方案的模式测试

基金项目: 国家科技部"973"项目亚印太交汇区海气相互作用(2006CB403600);气候系统模式发展中的关键技术与多模式比较研究(GYHY200806006);中国科学院"百人计划"项目联合资助。

Model test of a new air-sea turbulent flux parameterization scheme

  • 摘要: 将一种新型湍流通量参数化方案代入到大气环流模式CAM3中,对比分析了模式改进前后模拟的风应力、感热通量、潜热通量和降水的全球分布,以及风应力、潜热通量和降水的纬向平均。结果表明:改进后模式的模拟结果更接近ERS、ERA40湍流通量数据和CMAP综合降水数据,其中对西风带上洋面风应力、亚洲季风区的潜热通量和降水改进明显。由于该新型湍流通量参数化方案直接由整体理查逊数、空气动力学粗糙度和热力学粗糙度参数化稳定度参数,避免了通过循环迭代计算Obukhov长度,计算效率得到提高。
  • GAO Z,WANG Q,WANG S. An alternative approach to sea surface aerodynamic roughness[J]. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111, D22108.
    KARA A B,ROCHFORD P A. HURLBURT H. E. Efficient and accurate bulk parameterizations of air-sea fluxes for use in general circulation models[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2000, 17(10): 1421-1438.
    FAIRALL C W,BRADLEY E F,ROGERS D P,et al. Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere Coupled-Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment[J]. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101(C2): 3747-3764.
    MONIN A S,OBUKHOV A M. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the atmosphere near the ground[J]. Tr Akad Nauk SSSR Geofiz Inst, 1954, 24(151): 163-187.
    DYER A J. A review of flux-profile relationships[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1974, 7(3): 363-372.
    BELJAARS A C M,HOLTSLAG A A M. Flux parameterization over land surfaces for atmospheric models[J]. J Appl Meteorol, 1991, 30(3): 327-341.
    HGSTRM U. Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1996, 78(3): 215-246.
    LOUIS J F. A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1979, 17(2): 187-202.
    LOUIS J F,TIEDTKE M,GELEYN J F. A short history of the operational PBL-parameterization at ECMWF[M]. Berkshire: Workshop on Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization, Shinfield Park, Reading, European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, 1982: 59-80.
    GAO Z,HU W,LIU S. Test of the Louis scheme and COARE algorithm for friction velocity in different wind-sea/swell regimes[J]. Acta oceanologica sinica, 2005, 24(4): 20-28.
    WANG S,WANG Q,DOYLE J. Some improvements to Louis surface flux parameterization[M]// Preprints, 15th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence. Wageningen, Netherlands, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2002: 547-550.
    BYUN D W. On the analytical solutions of flux-profile relationships for the atmospheric surface layer[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1990, 29(7): 652-657.
    LAUNIAINEN J. Derivation of the relationship between the Obukhov stability parameter and the bulk Richardson number for flux-profile studies[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1995, 76(1): 165-179.
    胡艳冰,高志球,沙文钰. 一种新型湍流通量参数化方案的研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(suppl.2): 173-179.
    ZENG X, ZHAO M, Dickinson R E. Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamic algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using TOGA COARE and TAO data[J]. J Climate, 1998, 11: 2628-2644.
    BRUNKE M A, FAIRALL C W, ZENG X, et al. Which bulk aerodynamic algorithms are least problematic in computing ocean surface turbulent fluxes? [J]. J Climate, 2003, 16: 619-635.
    HACK J J,CARON J M,DANABASOGLU G,et al. CCSM-CAM3 Climate Simulation Sensitivity to Changes in Horizontal Resolution[J]. J Climate, 2006, 19(11): 2267-2289.
    HURRELL J W,HACK J J,PHILLIPS A S,et al. The dynamical simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) [J]. J Climate, 2006, 19(11): 2162-2183.
    CAPPS S B, ZENDER C S. Observed and CAM3 GCM sea surface wind speed distributions: Characterization, comparison, and bias reduction[J]. J Climate, 2008, 21: 6569-6585.
    李克让,林贤超,吴忠祥.太平洋风应力平均场的特征[J].地理学报,1996,51: 25-32.
    CHOU S H,NELKIN E,ARDIZZONE J,et al. A comparison of latent heat fluxes over global oceans for four flux products[J]. J Climate, 2004, 17(20): 3973-3989.
    CHOU S H,NELKIN E,ARDIZZONE J,et al. Surface turbulent heat and momentum fluxes over global oceans based on the goddard satellite retrievals, Version 2 (GSSTF2) [J]. J Climate, 2003, 16(20): 3256-3273.
    YU L, WELLER R A. Objectively analyzed air-sea heat fluxes for the global ice-free oceans (1981-2005) [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2007, 88: 527-539.
    CAYAN D R. Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: driving the sea surface temperature[J]. J Phys Oceanogr, 1992, 22: 859-881.
    ZHANG G J,MCPHADEN M J. The relationship between sea surface temperature and latent heat flux in the equatorial Pacific[J]. J Climate, 1995, 8(3): 589-605.
    CHOU S H,FERGUSON M P. Heat fluxes and roll circulations over the western Gulf Stream during an intense cold-air outbreak[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1991, 55(3): 255-281.
    CHOU S H. A comparison of airborne eddy correlation and bulk aerodynamic methods for ocean-air turbulent fluxes during cold-air outbreaks[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1993, 64(1): 75-100.
    COLLINS W D,RASCH P J,BOVILLE B A,et al. The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model: CAM3[J]. J Climate, 2006, 19(11): 2144-2161.
    PEIXOTO JOSE P,OORT ABRAHAM H. Physics of Climate[M]. Published by Springer, 1991.
    吴统文,钱正安,蔡英. CCM3模式中LSM积雪方案的改进研究(II):全球模拟试验分析[J]. 高原气象, 2004, 23(5): 569-578.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1568
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  1154
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-04-12
  • 修回日期:  2010-11-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回