东海北部外陆架EY02—1孔磁性地层研究

葛淑兰; 石学法; 吴永华; 熊应乾; 韩贻兵; 唐保根

东海北部外陆架EY02—1孔磁性地层研究

1.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 海洋沉积与环境地质国家海洋局重点实验室, 山东, 青岛, 266061;同济大学, 海洋地质国家重点实验室, 上海, 200092
2.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 海洋沉积与环境地质国家海洋局重点实验室, 山东, 青岛, 266061
3.
上海海洋石油局第一海洋地质调查大队, 上海, 201208

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40574029;40431002);国家海洋局青年基金资助项目(2004303)

计量
- 文章访问数: 741
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 1045
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2006-11-29
- 修回日期: 2007-08-31

Magnetostratigraphy of Borehole EY02—1 in the northern outer continental shelf of the East China Sea

1.
Key Laboratory of Marine Sedimentology and Environmental Geology of State Oceanic Administration, First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China;State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Marine Sedimentology and Environmental Geology of State Oceanic Administration, First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China
3.
First Marine Geological Investigation Team, Shanghai Offshore Petroleum Bureau, Shanghai 201208, China

摘要

摘要: 对长达70.20m的东海浅钻EY02-1进行了岩石磁学和古地磁分析,证明沉积物的载磁矿物主要为低矫顽力的磁铁矿,磁性地层揭示了发生于9.62~8.58m的磁极性事件,结合钻孔上部的AMS¹⁴C测年证明它为全新世初期的哥德堡磁极性漂移,线性外推的时间是距今12681~10206Ma,为全新世开始时地磁场是否发生过短期的磁极性漂移提供了新证据;与东海高分辨率的浅地层地震剖面以及典型钻孔(中法联合东海地震调查和DZQ4钻孔)对比还揭示,在中更新世地层中也出现过两次磁倾角变化。在钻孔中下部54.00~50.94m(2271—2151号样品)出现一段磁倾角变小甚至变成负值,但是由于该段沉积物以粗颗粒的砂为主并且负向样品并不连续,依据研究的标准不作为反磁极性事件。第二个比较连续的负向样品段出现在最底部70.20~64.31m。虽然研究区域内不乏揭示中更新统地层的地震剖面,但至今没有足够长的钻孔在时间上予以佐证。根据东海地震相对比和沉积物中海侵和海退旋回的不同特征以及布容期以来报道的反磁极性事件发生的时间来推测下部地层的时代归属。由于钻孔最底部的沉积主要是粗颗粒的粉砂质砂和细砂,同时钻孔也穿透了倒数第二冰期的杂乱地震相地层和其下的平行透明海相层,所以推测下部的倒转可能为发生在MIS8晚期的CR0反磁极性事件(距今265~255ka)。
- 东海外陆架 /
- EY02-1钻孔 /
- 磁性地层 /
- 哥德堡磁极性漂移 /
- CR0反磁极性事件
Abstract: Rock magnetic and paleo magnetic study is under taken for the 70.20 m borehole in the East China Sea(ECS),showing that the mainmagnetic carrier is low coercivity magnetite.Magnetostratigraphy in this borehole reveals excursion at 9.62~8.58 m that is proved to be Gothenburg excursion at the beginning of Holocene with the linearly extrapolated calendarage o f 12 681~10 206 a BP from AMS ¹⁴C dating,which provides a new evidence for the aut henticity of this excursion.The stratigraphic sequences are determined for the Late Pleisto cenebased on high-resolution subbottom seismic profiles and boreholes(typical seismic profiles and boreholes in the ECS)and two rever sals are indicated.One is from 54.00 to 50.94 m with a shallow ornegative inclination,which may be an Iceland Basin event,but this is not fully discussed because of coarse sediment(which is considered as an unreliable recorder of reversal)and discontinuo us negative sample inclinations.The second continuous negative section occurs at the bottom from 70.20 to 64.31 m. Althought here is seismic profile penetrating int othe Middle Pleist ocene sequence,real boreholes reaching such long time are absent.So the bottomage is deduced according to the seismic correlation,the cycles of transg ression and regression and the time span of rever sals occurring in the Brunhes chron.The sediments of the bottom reversal are mainly coarse silty sand and fine sand,and also the length of the borehole is calculated to cross the layers of the chaotic seismic phase of MIS6 and parallel stratigraphies of marine phase underneath,so it is concluded that the bottom reversal is CR0(265~255 ka BP)happened at late MIS8.
- northern outer continental shelf of East China Sea /
- Borehole EY02-1 /
- magnetostratigraphy /
- Gothenburg flip /
- CR0 reversal event

HTML全文

参考文献(36)

国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,青岛海洋地质研究所.东海晚第四纪以来古环境演化.2002.

上海海洋石油局.东海和黄海地质浅钻补充调查技术设计书.2000.

国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,青岛海洋地质研究所.东黄海典型过井浅地层剖面地质解释图说明书.2003.

刘忠臣,陈义兰,丁继胜.等.东海海底地形分区特征和成因研究[J].海洋科学进展,2003,21(2):160-173.

LIU Zhen-xia,BERNE S,SALTO Y,et al.Quaternary seismic stratigraphy and paleoenvironments on the continental shelf of the East China Sea[J].J Asian Earth Sciences,2000,18:441-452.

BERNE S,VAGNER P,GUICHARD F,et al.Pleistocene forced regressions and tidal sand ridges in the East China Sea[J].Marine Geology,2002,3193:1-23.

YOO D G,LEE C W,KIM S P,et al.Late Quaternary transgressive and highstand system transacts in the northern East China Sea mid shelf[J].Marine Geology,2002,187:313-328.

刘振夏,夏东兴.中国近海潮流沉积沙体[M].北京:海洋出版社,2004:125-126.

唐保根.东海陆架第四纪地层[M]//杨子赓.中国第四纪地层与国际对比.北京:海洋出版社,1996:56-75.

唐保根,陈裕迅,张异彪.等.黄海、东海晚第四纪地层划分、特征及其沉积环境演化的研究[C]//我国专属经济区和大陆架勘测研究论文集.北京:海洋出版社,2002:178-191.

LIU Jian,ZHU Ri-xiang,LI Guang-xue,et al.Rock magnetic properties of the fine-grained sediment on the East China Sea:implication for provenance[J].Marine Geology,2003,193:195-206.

刘振夏,BERNE S.中更新世以来东海陆架的古环境[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1999,2:1-9.

向荣,杨作升,SALTOY,等.近2 300 a来环境敏感粒度组分记录的东哑冬季风变化[J].中国科学(D辑)2006,36(7):654-662.

朱日祥,黄保春,潘永信,等.岩石磁学与古地磁实验室简介[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(2):177-181.

MACRO S.Late Pleistocene paleomagnetic secular variation from the Sea of Galilee,Israel[J].Geophys Res Lett,2002,29(21):2015.

CHAMPION D E,LANPHERE M A.Evidence for a new geomagnetic reversal from lava flows in Idaho:discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons[J].J Geophys Res,1988,93 (B10):11667-11680.

LANGEREIS G C G,DEKKERS M J,LANGE G J,et al.Magnetostratigraphy and astronomical calibration of the last 1.1 Myr from an eastern-Mediterranean core and dating of short events in the Brunhes[J].Geophys J Int,1997,129:75-94.

MORNER N A,LANSER J P.Gothenburg magnetic‘flip'[J].Nature,1974,251:408-409.

庄丽华,李铁刚,常凤鸣,等.东海中陆架晚第四纪底栖有孔虫定量分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2004,24(1);43-50.

陈俊仁.雷州半岛田洋火山湖盆磁学地层学的研究[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1988,8(1):73-84.

马醒华,孙知明,胡守云.哥德堡极性事件在湖泊沉积物中的记录[J].第四纪研究,1994,2:175-180.

ZHU Ri-xiang,GU Zhao-yan,HUANG Bao-chun,et al.Geomagnetic secular variation and climatic changes since 15 000 a BP,Beijing region[J].Sci in China (Ser B),1994,37(8):984-990.

ZHU Ri-xiang.COE R S,ZHAO Xi-xi.Sedimentary record of two geomagnetic excursions within the last 15 000 years in Beijing,China[J].Geophys Res,1998,103(B12):30323-30333.

李培英,王永吉,刘振夏.冲绳海槽年代地层与沉积速率[J].中国科学(D辑),1999,29(1):50-55.

CHANNELL J E T.Geomagnetic paleointensity and directional secular variation at ocean drilling program (ODP) Site 984(Biota Drift) since 500 ka:comparisons with ODP Site 983 (Gardar Drift)[J].J Geophys Res,1999,104(B10):22937-22951.

STONER J S,CHANNELL J E T,HODELL D A,et al.A 580 kyr paleomagnetic record from the sub-Antarctic South Atlantic Ocean Drilling Program Site 1089[J].J Geophys Res,2003,108(B5):EPM5-1.

ODA H,NAKAMURA K,IKEHARA K,et al.Paleomagnetic record from Academician Ridge,Lake Baikal..a reversal excursion at the base of marine oxygen isotope stage 6[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2002,202(1):117-132.

CHANNELL J E T,MAZAUD A,STONER J S.IODP expedition 303 (North Atlantic):excursions and reversals in the Brunhes and Matuyama chrons (Abstract).EOS Trans.AGU 86(52).Fall Meet.Suppl.2005,San Francisco,5-9 December.2005.

刘青松,朱日祥,潘永信,等.极性转换期间地球磁场快速倒转的统计模型[J].中国科学(D辑),1999.29(1):56-61.

秦蕴珊,赵一阳,陈丽蓉.等.黄海地质[M].北京:海洋出版社,1989:84-89.

周墨清,葛宗师.黄海及其邻近地区松散沉积物的磁性地层[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1990,10;21-32.

SAITO Y,KATAYAMA H,IKEHARA K,et al.Transgressive and highstand systems tracts and post-glacial transgression,the East China Sea[J].Sedimentary Geology,1998,122:217-232.

刘振夏,BERNE S,L'ATLANTE科学考察组.东海陆架的古河道和古三角洲[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2000,20(1):9-14.

葛淑兰.石学法,朱日祥.等.南黄海EY02-2磁性地层及古环境意义[J].科学通报,2005,50(22):2531-2540.

ROBERTS A P,WINKLHOFER M.Why are geomagnetic excursions not always recorded in sediments? Constraint from post-depostional remanent magnetization lock-in modeling[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2004,227:345-359.

MARTINSON D G,PISIAS N G,HAYS J D,et al.Age dating and the orbital theory of the ice ages,development of a high-resolution 0-300 000-year ehrono-stratigraphy[J].Quaternary Res,1987,27:1-29.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计