海口湾沿岸风暴潮风险评估
Risk assessment on storm surge in the Haikou Bay
-
摘要: 参考内陆洪水损失评估的方法,建立适用于海口湾沿岸风暴潮风险区的损失评估模型,分析了海口湾沿岸风暴潮的风险区域,并根据100a一遇极值高水位、100a一遇风暴潮与最高天文潮位的组合水位、可能最大风暴潮与最高天文潮位的组合高水位条件,分析淹没范围;统计100a一遇极值高水位淹没区内的建筑物,估计可能受灾人口.该文对海口湾沿岸的基本社会经济资料作了一、二级分类,并逐项进行统计,同时还根据需要作了抽样调查.对分部门的损失率计算方法作了详细介绍,得出个人家庭财产、国家集体财产、农作物和海水养殖等分部门的损失率分别为:30%,4%,70%和100%;以2001年社会经济资料为基础,100a一遇极值高水位为条件,计算出潮灾经济损失约为8.32亿元,个人家庭财产、国家集体财产、农作物及海水养殖、人员伤亡损失、间接损失等分部门的损失金额占总损失的比率分别为:13.0%,70.0%,0.7%,0.8%和15.5%.Abstract: Based on the flood loss evaluation method,the storm surge risk loss evaluation model of Haikou Bay is set up in this paper,with which,the storm surge risk district of Haikou Bay is analyzed.Possible submer gedareas are also analyzed according to the maximum hightidal level,the combination of strongest storm surge and highest astrono mical tide within 100 a scale.In addition,buildings and population in the submerged regions are statistically counted.Social and economic data are also analyzed in the paper.After introducing the methods of loss rate calculation,loss rates of private property,national collective property,crop and sea farming are estimated as 30%,4%,70%,100% separately.Taking social economic data in 2001 as the baseline,in the case of maximum high tidal level within 100 a scale,the economic loss caused by the storm surge is 832 million RM B,while the loss of private property,national collective property,crop and sea farming,monetary loss of death,indirect loss respectively is 13.0%,70.0%,0.7%,0.8%,15.5%.
-
Key words:
- storm surge /
- disaster /
- risk evaluation
-
吴培木,许金殿,李少英,等.港湾台风暴潮嵌套数值模型的初步研究[J].海洋学报,1996,7:35-42. 于斌,林少奕,王永信,等.风暴潮沿珠江河道上溯运动的数值模拟[J].海洋学报,2001,7:17-24. 吴少华,王喜年,戴明瑞,等.渤海风暴潮概况及温带风暴潮数值模拟[J].海洋学报,2002,3:28-34. 于福江,张占海.一个东海嵌套网格台风暴潮数值预报模式的研制与应[J].海洋学报,2002,4:23-33. JELESIANSKI C P,CHEN Jye,WILSON A Shaffer.SLOSH:sea,lake and overland surge from hurricanes [A].NOAA Technical Report NWS48 [R].1992.71. JELESIANSKI C P.SPLASH,landfall storm[A].NOAA,Tech.Men[C].NWS TDL-46,Washington.1972.1-52. 尹庆江,王喜年,吴少华,等.镇海可能最大台风增水的计算[J].海洋学报,1995,11:21-27. ZERGER A,SMITH D I,HUNTER G J,et al.Riding the storm:a comparison of uncertainty modeling techniques for storm surge risk management [J].Applied Geography,2002,22:307-330. ZERGER A.Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modeling [J].Environmental Modeling & Software,2002,17:287-294. WILLIAN J P等著,向立云等译.自然灾害风险评价与减灾政策[M].北京:地震出版社,1993.28-166. 刘树坤,宋玉山,程晓陶,等.黄河滩区及分滞洪区风险分析和减灾对策[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1999.141-233. ZHANG Li,CHEN Bin-xian,SHI Qi-fen.Assessment on monetaryloss of deathfrom national disasters[J].J Nat Disast,1995,4(1):12-16. 梁海燕,邹欣庆.海口湾沿岸风暴潮漫滩风险计算[J].海洋通报,2004,3:16-24. 郑裕盛,吴忠坤.南渡江河口段防洪规划有关问题的探讨[J].人民珠江,2000,2:24-29. 海口市统计局.海口年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2002. 江泽林.海南经济可持续发展战略[C].海口:海南出版社,2002.1-39. 世界银行.碧水蓝天——展望21世纪的中国环境[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1997.17-21. 陈寒松.海南省千年自然灾害史料集[M].海南:海南出版社,1993.174-236. 海南省海洋局,海南省三防指挥办公室合编.海南岛沿海警戒水位确定报告.1992,24-28. 靳乐山.环境质量价值若干评估技术研究.中国农业大学经济管理学院.1997,38-52.
计量
- 文章访问数: 800
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 1483
- 被引次数: 0